Compare Apple iPhone 4 32GB vs HTC Desire 820

Feature Comparison

  • HTC Desire 820 has 36.0% more Screen Size
  • Apple iPhone 4 32GB has 32GB Internal Storage, whereas HTC Desire 820 has 16GB Internal Storage
  • HTC Desire 820 has 75.0% more RAM
 
Apple iPhone 4 32GB
HTC Desire 820
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
63 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
64 Value For Money Score
69 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 640 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
329.7 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Apple A series Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Apple A4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 615   
Processor Type
Single-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
512MB 2GB   
Graphics
PowerVR SGX535 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 8MP   
Camera Details
LED flash Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
iOS Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
iOS -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Apple 30-pin Connector Micro USB   
Features
GPS Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
115.2 x 58.6 x 9.3 157.7 x 78.7 x 7.7   
Weight
137 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black White, Red, Gray   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 11.2GB   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1420mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Apple iPhone 4 32GB vs HTC Desire 820 Specs

Specs
Apple iPhone 4 32GBHTC Desire 820  
Screen Size 3.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 512MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1420mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP8MP  

HTC Desire 820 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The Dual tone design is unique and eye-catching
  • The front facing stereo speakers are excellent
  • The Sense UI is sleek and light on memory
  • HTC Zoe is a nice little edition for you to share quick video clips
The Bad
  • The back of the phone can pick up a ton of scratches
  • Lacks NFC connectivity
  • Video recording in 1080P is not a great experience
  • Battery life is erratic

Apple iPhone 4 32GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Fresh and gorgeous new design
  • Extremely premium build quality
  • Retina display is probably the best display we have seen at the time of the launch of this phone
  • iOS 4 is fresh and brings tons of improvements
  • Apple's ecosystem has tons of apps and games
The Bad
  • No expandable storage
  • The glass on the back of the phone is prone to shattering
  • Uses a 30 pin Apple proprietary cable for charging and syncing
  • Questions being raised about the reception on the device
  • The speaker is not the loudest

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Apple iPhone 4 32GB with HTC Desire 820. When you see Apple iPhone 4 32GB Vs HTC Desire 820 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Apple iPhone 4 32GB stands against HTC Desire 820 and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated October 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page