Compare Apple iPhone 4S 16GB vs Oppo F1s

Feature Comparison

  • The Oppo F1s has 5.5 inch Screen Size, which is 36.0% more
  • The Oppo F1s's Internal Storage measures in at 32GB. When compared to the other product's Internal Storage, it is 50.0% more
  • The Oppo F1s's got 3GB RAM, while Apple iPhone 4S 16GB's RAM is 512MB
 
Apple iPhone 4S 16GB
Oppo F1s
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
56 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
89 Value For Money Score
79 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 640 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
329.7 PPI 293.72 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 4   
Chipset     
Brand
Apple A series MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Apple A5 MediaTek MT6750   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
512MB 3GB   
Graphics
PowerVR SGX543 MP2 Mali-T860 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 16MP   
Camera Details
LED Flash, Touch focus, Autofocus, Geo-Tagging, Face Detection, Panorama & HDR Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
iOS Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
iOS ColorOS 3.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Apple Lightning Connector Micro USB   
Features
- Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
115.2 x 58.6 x 9.3 154.5 x 76 x 7.38   
Weight
140 grams 160 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Gold, Rose Gold, Gray, White   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Metal   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 25.09GB   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1432mAh 3075mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
- No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Apple iPhone 4S 16GB vs Oppo F1s Specs

Specs
Apple iPhone 4S 16GBOppo F1s  
Screen Size 3.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 512MB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1432mAh3075mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP16MP  

Oppo F1s Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Excellent front facing camera resulting is great selfies
  • Good battery life, should last through the day most of the time
  • Slim build and aesthetically pleasing design
  • Dedicated MicroSD card slot with Dual SIM support
The Bad
  • No Full HD display is a bummer
  • Dated Android version with no update schedule
  • Charging the device is slow

Apple iPhone 4S 16GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Best in class camera
  • Solid and robust construction with materials Metal & Glass
  • Very sharp Retina display (330PPI)
  • Battery lasts easily through day with minimum gaming
The Bad
  • Quite small display at just 3.5 inch
  • Mediocre performance
  • Glass front and back prone to damage

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Apple iPhone 4S 16GB with Oppo F1s. When you see Apple iPhone 4S 16GB Vs Oppo F1s comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Apple iPhone 4S 16GB stands against Oppo F1s and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Oppo F1s is Rs. 16,990. The prices for both these products were updated October 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page