Compare Apple iPhone 4S vs Micromax Dual 5

Feature Comparison

  • Micromax Dual 5 has 5.5 inch Screen Size and Apple iPhone 4S has 3.5 inch Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of Micromax Dual 5's is 93.0% more than Apple iPhone 4S
  • RAM of Micromax Dual 5's is 87.0% more than Apple iPhone 4S
 
Apple iPhone 4S
Micromax Dual 5
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
46 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
68 Value For Money Score
87 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 640 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
329.7 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Apple A series Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
Apple A5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 652   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
512MB 4GB   
Graphics
PowerVR SGX543 MP2 Adreno 510   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 13MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Panorama, HDR Photo +13MP Rear Camera, Face detection, Continuous shooting, White balance settings, Digital zoom, ISO Settings, Geo tagging, Exposure compensation, Panorama, Self timer, HDR, Scene mode, Touch focus   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual Rear Camera, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual LED Flash, Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
iOS Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
iOS -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Apple 30-pin Connector USB Type C   
Features
- Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
115.2 x 58.6 x 9.3 -   
Weight
140 grams 164 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Gold   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 128GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
5.4GB -   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1432mAh 3200mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- Yes, Quick Charge 3.0   

Apple iPhone 4S vs Micromax Dual 5 Specs

Specs
Apple iPhone 4SMicromax Dual 5  
Screen Size 3.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 512MB4GB  
Battery Capacity 1432mAh3200mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP13MP  

Micromax Dual 5 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Customisable smart key
  • Ample storage-128GB
  • Good cameras
  • Solid & aesthetically pleasing body
The Bad
  • Heats a bit
  • Tons of bloatware
  • Does not come with the latest Android version

Apple iPhone 4S Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Best in class camera
  • Solid and robust construction with materials Metal & Glass
  • Very sharp Retina display (330PPI)
  • Battery lasts easily through day with minimum gaming
The Bad
  • Quite small display at just 3.5 inch
  • Mediocre performance
  • Glass front and back prone to damage

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Apple iPhone 4S with Micromax Dual 5. When you see Apple iPhone 4S Vs Micromax Dual 5 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Apple iPhone 4S stands against Micromax Dual 5 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Micromax Dual 5 is Rs. 23,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page