Compare Apple iPhone 4S vs Samsung Galaxy C7 (64GB)

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Samsung Galaxy C7 (64GB)'s is 38.0% more than Apple iPhone 4S
  • The Samsung Galaxy C7 (64GB)'s got 64GB Internal Storage, while Apple iPhone 4S's Internal Storage is 8GB
  • Samsung Galaxy C7 (64GB)'s 4GB RAM is more than Apple iPhone 4S's 512MB RAM
 
Apple iPhone 4S
Samsung Galaxy C7 (64GB)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
49 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
68 Value For Money Score
90 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.5 inch 5.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 640 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
329.7 PPI 386 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Apple A series Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1GHz 2GHz   
Processor
Apple A5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 625   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
512MB 4GB   
Graphics
PowerVR SGX543 MP2 Adreno 506   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 16MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Panorama, HDR Photo Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
iOS Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
iOS -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Apple 30-pin Connector Micro USB   
Features
- Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
115.2 x 58.6 x 9.3 156.6 x 77.2 x 6.7   
Weight
140 grams 169 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Gold, Rose Gold, Dark Gray   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
5.4GB 52.67GB   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes, (Uses SIM 2 Slot)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1432mAh 3300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- Yes, (Quick Charge 3.0)   

Apple iPhone 4S vs Samsung Galaxy C7 (64GB) Specs

Specs
Apple iPhone 4SSamsung Galaxy C7 (64GB)  
Screen Size 3.5 inch5.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP16MP  
RAM 512MB4GB  
Battery Capacity 1432mAh3300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP8MP  

Samsung Galaxy C7 (64GB) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sturdy build quality
  • Brilliant Full HD AMOLED display
  • Battery life holds up well
  • Decent performance from the chipset
The Bad
  • Not the fastest fingerprint scanner
  • Hybrid second slot
  • HDR mode needed for decent shots that capture at just 8MP resolution
  • Lacks Gyroscope sensor

Apple iPhone 4S Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Best in class camera
  • Solid and robust construction with materials Metal & Glass
  • Very sharp Retina display (330PPI)
  • Battery lasts easily through day with minimum gaming
The Bad
  • Quite small display at just 3.5 inch
  • Mediocre performance
  • Glass front and back prone to damage

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Apple iPhone 4S with Samsung Galaxy C7 (64GB). When you see Apple iPhone 4S Vs Samsung Galaxy C7 (64GB) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Apple iPhone 4S stands against Samsung Galaxy C7 (64GB) and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated October 20, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page