Compare Apple iPhone 4S vs Vivo V3 Max

Feature Comparison

  • Vivo V3 Max's got 36.0% more Screen Size
  • Vivo V3 Max has 75.0% more Internal Storage
  • Vivo V3 Max's RAM is 87.0% more
 
Apple iPhone 4S
Vivo V3 Max
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
68 Value For Money Score
82 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 640 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
329.7 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Apple A series Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
Apple A5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 652   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
512MB 4GB   
Graphics
PowerVR SGX543 MP2 Adreno 510   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Panorama, HDR Photo Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
iOS Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
iOS Funtouch OS 2.5   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Apple 30-pin Connector Micro USB   
Features
- Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
115.2 x 58.6 x 9.3 153.9 x 77.1 x 7.58   
Weight
140 grams 168 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Rose Gold, Gold, Silver   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
5.4GB 23.61GB   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1432mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- Yes   

Apple iPhone 4S vs Vivo V3 Max Specs

Specs
Apple iPhone 4SVivo V3 Max  
Screen Size 3.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 512MB4GB  
Battery Capacity 1432mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP8MP  

Vivo V3 Max Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Really fast and accurate fingerprint scanner
  • Excellent build quality that inspires confidence in the phone
  • Comes with support for Quick Charging so you should be good to go in a flash
  • Funtouch OS has some really interesting add ons especially to the camera app
The Bad
  • The colours on the images that the camera takes are a bit on the dull side
  • The phone is not compatible with Android Auto
  • Although the audio is loud, it tends to be on the flat side and lacks overall balance

Apple iPhone 4S Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Best in class camera
  • Solid and robust construction with materials Metal & Glass
  • Very sharp Retina display (330PPI)
  • Battery lasts easily through day with minimum gaming
The Bad
  • Quite small display at just 3.5 inch
  • Mediocre performance
  • Glass front and back prone to damage

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Apple iPhone 4S with Vivo V3 Max. When you see Apple iPhone 4S Vs Vivo V3 Max comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Apple iPhone 4S stands against Vivo V3 Max and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Vivo V3 Max is Rs. 21,500. The prices for both these products were updated October 21, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page