Compare Apple iPhone 5c 16GB vs HTC Desire 828 32GB

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of HTC Desire 828 32GB's is 27.0% more than Apple iPhone 5c 16GB
  • The HTC Desire 828 32GB has 32GB Internal Storage, which is 50.0% more
  • HTC Desire 828 32GB has 66.0% more RAM
 
Apple iPhone 5c 16GB
HTC Desire 828 32GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
83 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
65 Value For Money Score
73 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1136 x 640 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
326 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Apple A series MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Apple A6 MediaTek MT6753   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
PowerVR SGX543 MP3 Mali-T720   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1.2MP 4MP   
Camera Details
Simultaneous HD Video & Image Recording, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
iOS Android   
OS Version
iOS 7 Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- Sense 6.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Apple Lightning Connector Micro USB   
Features
GPS GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
124.4 x 59.2 x 9 157.7 x 78.9 x 7.9   
Weight
132 grams 148 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, WiFi Calling 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Blue, Yellow, Pink, White, Green White, Dark Gray   
Build Material
Polycarbonate Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
12.5GB 27GB   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 2TB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM + CDMA   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1510mAh 2800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Apple iPhone 5c 16GB vs HTC Desire 828 32GB Specs

Specs
Apple iPhone 5c 16GBHTC Desire 828 32GB  
Screen Size 4 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1510mAh2800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1.2MP4MP  

Apple iPhone 5c 16GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Available in bright colour options unlike most phones
  • Compact and fits in hand well; Ideal for one handed usage
  • Polycarbonate build ensures that the device is really light weight
The Bad
  • Sluggish performance especially when upgraded to the latest iOS updates
  • Average camera in low light conditions
  • Does not feel like a premium product that we are used to seeing from Apple

HTC Desire 828 32GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Rear camera has Optical Image Stabilisation (OIS)
  • Crisp Full HD display with a pixel density of 401 PPI
  • Decent battery life
  • Smooth User Interface by HTC
The Bad
  • Lots of bloatware pre-installed
  • No fast charging support
  • Lacks a fingerprint sensor

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Apple iPhone 5c 16GB with HTC Desire 828 32GB. When you see Apple iPhone 5c 16GB Vs HTC Desire 828 32GB comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Apple iPhone 5c 16GB stands against HTC Desire 828 32GB and which one you should buy. The lowest price for HTC Desire 828 32GB is Rs. 10,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 24, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page