Compare Apple iPhone 5c 16GB vs Oppo R7 Lite

Feature Comparison

  • The Oppo R7 Lite's Screen Size measures in at 5 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 20.0% more
  • Internal Storage of Apple iPhone 5c 16GB is the same as Oppo R7 Lite
  • Oppo R7 Lite's RAM is 50.0% more
 
Apple iPhone 5c 16GB
Oppo R7 Lite
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
85 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
65 Value For Money Score
74 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1136 x 640 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
326 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Apple A series Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Apple A6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 615   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
PowerVR SGX543 MP3 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1.2MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Simultaneous HD Video & Image Recording, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
iOS Android   
OS Version
iOS 7 Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Apple Lightning Connector Micro USB   
Features
GPS FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
124.4 x 59.2 x 9 143 x 71 x 6.3   
Weight
132 grams 147 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, WiFi Calling 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Blue, Yellow, Pink, White, Green Gold, Silver   
Build Material
Polycarbonate Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
12.5GB -   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1510mAh 2320mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Apple iPhone 5c 16GB vs Oppo R7 Lite Specs

Specs
Apple iPhone 5c 16GBOppo R7 Lite  
Screen Size 4 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1510mAh2320mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1.2MP8MP  

Apple iPhone 5c 16GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Available in bright colour options unlike most phones
  • Compact and fits in hand well; Ideal for one handed usage
  • Polycarbonate build ensures that the device is really light weight
The Bad
  • Sluggish performance especially when upgraded to the latest iOS updates
  • Average camera in low light conditions
  • Does not feel like a premium product that we are used to seeing from Apple

Oppo R7 Lite Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Solidly built with no creeks and loose components
  • Metallic body gives the phone a premium feel
  • Excellent battery life
  • Feature full and interesting camera app with lots of customization possible
The Bad
  • No Full HD display
  • The camera really struggles in low light shots
  • Surprisingly there is no NFC or FM Radio
  • Sound output, both from headphones and speakers is below satisfactory

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Apple iPhone 5c 16GB with Oppo R7 Lite. When you see Apple iPhone 5c 16GB Vs Oppo R7 Lite comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Apple iPhone 5c 16GB stands against Oppo R7 Lite and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated April 26, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page