Compare Apple iPhone 5c 32GB vs CREO Mark 1

Feature Comparison

  • The CREO Mark 1's got 5.5 inch Screen Size, while Apple iPhone 5c 32GB's Screen Size is 4 inch
  • Both Apple iPhone 5c 32GB and CREO Mark 1 have same Internal Storage
  • The 3GB RAM on the CREO Mark 1 is 66.0% more
 
Apple iPhone 5c 32GB
CREO Mark 1
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
61 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
73 Value For Money Score
81 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1136 x 640 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
326 PPI 534 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Apple A series MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.95GHz   
Processor
Apple A6 MediaTek MT6795 Helio X10   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
PowerVR SGX543 MP3 PowerVR G6200   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 21MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Simultaneous HD Video & Image Recording, Touch Focus, Geo-Tagging, Face D, Panorama, HDR Sony IMX230 Sensor, f/2.0 Aperture   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
iOS Android   
OS Version
iOS 7 Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Apple Lightning Connector Micro USB   
Features
GPS GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
124.4 x 59.2 x 9 155.4 x 76.1 x 8.7   
Weight
132 grams 190 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, WiFi Calling 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Blue, White, Green, Yellow, Pink Black   
Build Material
Polycarbonate Glass, Metal   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1510mAh 3100mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- Yes, High Voltage Fast Charging   

Apple iPhone 5c 32GB vs CREO Mark 1 Specs

Specs
Apple iPhone 5c 32GBCREO Mark 1  
Screen Size 4 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP21MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1510mAh3100mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP8MP  

CREO Mark 1 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good-looking and well-built
  • Promise of monthly software updates
  • It's Android-based Fuel OS has a clean design with useful features
The Bad
  • Sub-par camera performance
  • Buggy software at launch
  • Battery life could've been better
  • Lag observed while using heavy-duty apps like intensive games

Apple iPhone 5c 32GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Available in bright colour options unlike most phones
  • Compact and fits in hand well; Ideal for one handed usage
  • Polycarbonate build ensures that the device is really light weight
The Bad
  • Average camera in low light conditions
  • Sluggish performance especially when upgraded to the latest iOS updates
  • Does not feel like a premium product that we are used to seeing from Apple

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Apple iPhone 5c 32GB with CREO Mark 1. When you see Apple iPhone 5c 32GB Vs CREO Mark 1 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Apple iPhone 5c 32GB stands against CREO Mark 1 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for CREO Mark 1 is Rs. 19,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 20, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page