Compare Apple iPhone 5c 32GB vs HTC One E9+

Feature Comparison

  • HTC One E9+'s Screen Size is 27.0% more
  • Both Apple iPhone 5c 32GB and HTC One E9+ have same Internal Storage
  • The HTC One E9+'s RAM measures in at 3GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 66.0% more
 
Apple iPhone 5c 32GB
HTC One E9+
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
64 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
73 Value For Money Score
81 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1136 x 640 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
326 PPI 534 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 4   
Chipset     
Brand
Apple A series MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 2GHz   
Processor
Apple A6 MediaTek MT6795 Helio X10   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
PowerVR SGX543 MP3 PowerVR G6200   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 20MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 4MP   
Camera Details
Simultaneous HD Video & Image Recording, Touch Focus, Geo-Tagging, Face D, Panorama, HDR Dual-LED Flash, Automatic Simultaneous Video And Image Recording, Geo-Tagging, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
iOS Android   
OS Version
iOS 7 Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- Sense UI   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Apple Lightning Connector Micro USB   
Features
GPS Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
124.4 x 59.2 x 9 156.5 x 76.5 x 7.54   
Weight
132 grams 149 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, WiFi Calling 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Blue, White, Green, Yellow, Pink Meteor Grey, Rose Gold   
Build Material
Polycarbonate -   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 22GB   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 2TB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1510mAh 2800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Apple iPhone 5c 32GB vs HTC One E9+ Specs

Specs
Apple iPhone 5c 32GBHTC One E9+  
Screen Size 4 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP20MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1510mAh2800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP4MP  

HTC One E9+ Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Mindboggling display quality at 534PPI with Gorilla Glass 4 protection
  • HTC BoomSound Stereo speakers
  • Metal unibody construction makes it feel premium
  • Decent performance and battery life
The Bad
  • Runs outdated Android 5.0 Lollipop
  • Lacks fingerprint sensor
  • No fast charging support

Apple iPhone 5c 32GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Available in bright colour options unlike most phones
  • Compact and fits in hand well; Ideal for one handed usage
  • Polycarbonate build ensures that the device is really light weight
The Bad
  • Average camera in low light conditions
  • Sluggish performance especially when upgraded to the latest iOS updates
  • Does not feel like a premium product that we are used to seeing from Apple

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Apple iPhone 5c 32GB with HTC One E9+. When you see Apple iPhone 5c 32GB Vs HTC One E9+ comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Apple iPhone 5c 32GB stands against HTC One E9+ and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated August 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page