Compare Apple iPhone 5c vs Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313

Feature Comparison

  • The Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313's got 5 inch Screen Size, while Apple iPhone 5c's Screen Size is 4 inch
  • Internal Storage of Apple iPhone 5c is the same as Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313
  • RAM of Apple iPhone 5c is the same as Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313
 
Apple iPhone 5c
Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
87 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
74 Value For Money Score
70 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1136 x 640 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
326 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Apple A series MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
Apple A6 Mediatek MT6592M   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 1GB   
Graphics
PowerVR SGX543 MP3 Mali-450 MP4   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1.2MP 2MP   
Camera Details
Simultaneous HD Video & Image Recording, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR Auto Focus, Dual-LED Flash   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
iOS Android   
OS Version
iOS 7 Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Apple Lightning Connector Micro USB   
Features
GPS GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
124.4 x 59.2 x 9 -   
Weight
132 grams -   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, WiFi Calling 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Blue, White, Yellow, Pink, Green Black   
Build Material
Polycarbonate -   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1510mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Apple iPhone 5c vs Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313 Specs

Specs
Apple iPhone 5cMicromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313  
Screen Size 4 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1510mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1.2MP2MP  

Apple iPhone 5c Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Available in bright colour options unlike most phones
  • Compact and fits in hand well; Ideal for one handed usage
  • Polycarbonate build ensures that the device is really light weight
The Bad
  • Sluggish performance especially when upgraded to the latest iOS updates
  • Average camera in low light conditions
  • Does not feel like a premium product that we are used to seeing from Apple

Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp display with 294PPI
  • Decent camera with full HD video recording
  • USB OTG support
The Bad
  • Many bloatwares pre-installed
  • Average battery life
  • Mediocre performance with just 1GB of RAM
  • Lacks 4G connectivity

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Apple iPhone 5c with Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313. When you see Apple iPhone 5c Vs Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Apple iPhone 5c stands against Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313 and which one you should buy. The best price of Apple iPhone 5c is currently Rs. 11,990. The lowest price for Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313 is Rs. 6,199. The prices for both these products were updated October 23, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page