Compare Asus ZenFone 2 Laser 2GB/16GB vs Vivo Y51L

Feature Comparison

  • The Asus ZenFone 2 Laser 2GB/16GB has 5.5 inch Screen Size, which is 9.0% more
  • Internal Storage of Asus ZenFone 2 Laser 2GB/16GB is the same as Vivo Y51L
  • RAM of Asus ZenFone 2 Laser 2GB/16GB is the same as Vivo Y51L
 
Asus ZenFone 2 Laser 2GB/16GB
Vivo Y51L
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
77 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
71 Value For Money Score
64 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 960 x 540 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 220.29 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 4 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 306 Adreno 306   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
f/2.0 Aperture, 5-element Lens, Auto Focus, Dual Color Flash -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Laser Autofocus, Dual LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- FunTouch OS 2.5   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
152.5 x 77.2 x 10.8 143.80 x 71.70 x 7.52   
Weight
170 grams 157 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Red, Black, Gold White, Black   
Build Material
Polycarbonate -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11GB 10.86GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 2350mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Asus ZenFone 2 Laser 2GB/16GB vs Vivo Y51L Specs

Specs
Asus ZenFone 2 Laser 2GB/16GBVivo Y51L  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh2350mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Asus ZenFone 2 Laser 2GB/16GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good battery life that easily lasts for a day
  • Fast and accurate Autofocus
  • Good camera especially in indoor environment
  • Gorilla Glass 4 protection
The Bad
  • Outdoor shots from the camera tend to have washed out colours
  • Noticeable delay in starting and switching apps
  • Display is not the brightest which results in below average readability in direct sun
  • Plenty of pre-installed apps that cannot be uninstalled

Vivo Y51L Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Decent Processor and RAM combination delivers average performance
The Bad
  • Poor Resolution, Small battery

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Asus ZenFone 2 Laser 2GB/16GB with Vivo Y51L. When you see Asus ZenFone 2 Laser 2GB/16GB Vs Vivo Y51L comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Asus ZenFone 2 Laser 2GB/16GB stands against Vivo Y51L and which one you should buy. The best price of Asus ZenFone 2 Laser 2GB/16GB is currently Rs. 10,699. The lowest price for Vivo Y51L is Rs. 8,922. The prices for both these products were updated April 24, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page