Compare Asus ZenFone Zoom vs Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro

Feature Comparison

  • Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has 6 inch Screen Size, whereas Asus ZenFone Zoom has 5.5 inch Screen Size
  • The Asus ZenFone Zoom's got 128GB Internal Storage, while Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's Internal Storage is 64GB
  • Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has 33.0% more RAM
 
Asus ZenFone Zoom
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
73 Value For Money Score
87 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 6 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
400.5 PPI 367 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 4 Corning Gorilla Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
Intel Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
2.3GHz 1.95GHz   
Processor
Intel Atom Z3580 Qualcomm Snapdragon 653   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
4GB 6GB   
Graphics
PowerVR G6430 Adreno 510   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 16MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 16MP   
Camera Details
Low Light Mode, Backlight (HDR) Mode, Enhanced Beautification Mode, Manual Mode, Zero Shutter Lag Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, OIS, LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (5.0) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
158.9 x 78.84 x 11.95 162.9 x 80.7 x 6.9   
Weight
185 grams 189 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Gold, Black, Rose Gold   
Build Material
Metal, Leather Metal   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
128GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 4000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- Yes   

Asus ZenFone Zoom vs Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro Specs

Specs
Asus ZenFone ZoomSamsung Galaxy C9 Pro  
Screen Size 5.5 inch6 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP16MP  
RAM 4GB6GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh4000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP16MP  

Asus ZenFone Zoom Pros & Cons

The Good
  • 3x Optical Zoom on the rear camera
  • Sturdy build quality with a premium leather back
The Bad
  • Average camera performance
  • Preinstalled bloatware

Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Decent overall perfromance
  • 4000mAh battery lasts enough
  • Great camera on either sides
  • Crisp & vibrant display
The Bad
  • Huge footprint, thanks to the massive display
  • Not the best performer in the price range
  • Does not come with the latest Android 7.0 Nougat

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Asus ZenFone Zoom with Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. When you see Asus ZenFone Zoom Vs Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Asus ZenFone Zoom stands against Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro and which one you should buy. The best price of Asus ZenFone Zoom is currently Rs. 14,999. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is Rs. 29,820. The prices for both these products were updated October 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page