Compare BlackBerry Bold 4 9900 vs Micromax Canvas Mega 4G

Feature Comparison

  • Micromax Canvas Mega 4G's got 49.0% more Screen Size
  • The Micromax Canvas Mega 4G's got 16GB Internal Storage, while BlackBerry Bold 4 9900's Internal Storage is 8GB
  • The Micromax Canvas Mega 4G's got 3GB RAM, while BlackBerry Bold 4 9900's RAM is 768MB
 
BlackBerry Bold 4 9900
Micromax Canvas Mega 4G
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
25 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
51 Value For Money Score
78 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
2.8 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
640 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
285.7 PPI 236 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
- Quad-Core   
RAM
768MB 3GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
- 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Face Detection, Image Stabilization -   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
BlackBerry Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
BlackBerry OS v7 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touch and Type Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
- InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
115 x 66 x 10.5 154 x 78.7 x 8.9   
Weight
130 grams 145 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Gold, Blue   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 11.21GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Mini (Normal) SIM, Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1230mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

BlackBerry Bold 4 9900 vs Micromax Canvas Mega 4G Specs

Specs
BlackBerry Bold 4 9900Micromax Canvas Mega 4G  
Screen Size 2.8 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 768MB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1230mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP  

BlackBerry Bold 4 9900 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • One of the best QWERTY keyboards on a smartphone for a great typing experience
  • Added touchscreen is great for those who do not like the trackpad
  • A bold and luxurious design makes the phone feel really premium
  • Overall snappy performance
The Bad
  • Poor third party app support
  • Battery life is a little dissapointing
  • The call quality on the device can be really hit and miss
  • Rear camera does not have autofocus

Micromax Canvas Mega 4G Pros & Cons

The Good
  • 4G LTE support in India with VoLTE for Jio users
  • Decent day-to-day performance
  • Good multitasking experience, thanks to the 3GB RAM
The Bad
  • Average display sharpness
  • Outdated Android 5.1 Lollipop

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare BlackBerry Bold 4 9900 with Micromax Canvas Mega 4G. When you see BlackBerry Bold 4 9900 Vs Micromax Canvas Mega 4G comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how BlackBerry Bold 4 9900 stands against Micromax Canvas Mega 4G and which one you should buy. The best price of BlackBerry Bold 4 9900 is currently Rs. 3,370. The lowest price for Micromax Canvas Mega 4G is Rs. 8,500. The prices for both these products were updated August 21, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page