Compare BlackBerry Bold 4 9900 vs Micromax Canvas Selfie A255

Feature Comparison

  • Micromax Canvas Selfie A255's 4.7 inch Screen Size is more than BlackBerry Bold 4 9900's 2.8 inch Screen Size
  • The Internal Storage on Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 is 50.0% more
  • Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 has 62.0% more RAM
 
BlackBerry Bold 4 9900
Micromax Canvas Selfie A255
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
43 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
51 Value For Money Score
71 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
2.8 inch 4.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
640 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
285.7 PPI 312.5 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.7GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6592   
Processor Type
- Octa-Core   
RAM
768MB 2GB   
Graphics
- Mali-450 MP4   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
- 13MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Face Detection, Image Stabilization -   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
BlackBerry Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
BlackBerry OS v7 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touch and Type Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
- GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
115 x 66 x 10.5 146.3 x 67.3 x 9.65   
Weight
130 grams 138 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Angelic White, Mystic Blue   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 12.14GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1230mAh 2300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

BlackBerry Bold 4 9900 vs Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 Specs

Specs
BlackBerry Bold 4 9900Micromax Canvas Selfie A255  
Screen Size 2.8 inch4.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 768MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1230mAh2300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 13MP  

Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Front facing flash for low light selfie and selfie lovers
  • Crisp display at 312PPI with Gorilla Glass 3 protection
The Bad
  • Quite old Android version (4.4 KitKat)
  • Mediocre performance

BlackBerry Bold 4 9900 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • One of the best QWERTY keyboards on a smartphone for a great typing experience
  • Added touchscreen is great for those who do not like the trackpad
  • A bold and luxurious design makes the phone feel really premium
  • Overall snappy performance
The Bad
  • Poor third party app support
  • Battery life is a little dissapointing
  • The call quality on the device can be really hit and miss
  • Rear camera does not have autofocus

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare BlackBerry Bold 4 9900 with Micromax Canvas Selfie A255. When you see BlackBerry Bold 4 9900 Vs Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how BlackBerry Bold 4 9900 stands against Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 and which one you should buy. The best price of BlackBerry Bold 4 9900 is currently Rs. 3,390. The lowest price for Micromax Canvas Selfie A255 is Rs. 6,099. The prices for both these products were updated October 21, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page