Compare BlackBerry Classic Q20 vs Lenovo Phab 2 Pro

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Lenovo Phab 2 Pro's is 45.0% more than BlackBerry Classic Q20
  • Lenovo Phab 2 Pro has 75.0% more Internal Storage
  • RAM of Lenovo Phab 2 Pro's is 50.0% more than BlackBerry Classic Q20
 
BlackBerry Classic Q20
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
32 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52 Value For Money Score
83 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.5 inch 6.4 inch   
Screen Resolution
720 x 720 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
290.9 PPI 459 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 836 Qualcomm Snapdragon 652   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 4GB   
Graphics
Adreno 225 Adreno 510   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 16MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, HDR, panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
BlackBerry Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
BlackBerry OS 10.3 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
131 x 72.4 x 10.2 179.8 x 88.6 x 10.7   
Weight
177 grams 259 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Champagne Gold   
Build Material
- Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2515mAh 4050mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- Yes, 2.4 x Turbo Charging   

BlackBerry Classic Q20 vs Lenovo Phab 2 Pro Specs

Specs
BlackBerry Classic Q20Lenovo Phab 2 Pro  
Screen Size 3.5 inch6.4 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP16MP  
RAM 2GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 2515mAh4050mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP8MP  

Lenovo Phab 2 Pro Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Day-to-day operations are lag free
  • Display and camera are decent
The Bad
  • Poor screen visibility under direct sunlight
  • No 4K video recording is a bummer
  • Project Tango is far from perfect

BlackBerry Classic Q20 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The keyboard is classic BlackBerry and is excellent for typing
  • Excellent call reception
  • BlackBerry Assistant is useful
  • Long battery life
The Bad
  • Camera is bad in low light conditions
  • Touchscreen is cramped which makes hitting a touch point challenging
  • Trackpad is not all that useful
  • No Google Play Services so plenty of Android apps do not function

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare BlackBerry Classic Q20 with Lenovo Phab 2 Pro. When you see BlackBerry Classic Q20 Vs Lenovo Phab 2 Pro comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how BlackBerry Classic Q20 stands against Lenovo Phab 2 Pro and which one you should buy. The best price of BlackBerry Classic Q20 is currently Rs. 17,590. The lowest price for Lenovo Phab 2 Pro is Rs. 25,900. The prices for both these products were updated October 23, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page