Compare BlackBerry Classic Q20 vs Nubia Z11

Feature Comparison

  • The Screen Size on Nubia Z11 is 36.0% more
  • Nubia Z11 has 75.0% more Internal Storage
  • Nubia Z11 has 66.0% more RAM
 
BlackBerry Classic Q20
Nubia Z11
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
31 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52 Value For Money Score
77 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
720 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
290.9 PPI 403 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 2.1GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 836 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 6GB   
Graphics
Adreno 225 Adreno 530   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 16MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama 1/2.8" sensor size, 1.12 µm pixel size, geo-tagging, touch focus, face/smile detection, panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, OIS, Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
BlackBerry Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
BlackBerry OS 10.3 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
131 x 72.4 x 10.2 151.8 x 72.3 x 7.5   
Weight
177 grams 162 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Black, Gray   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2515mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

BlackBerry Classic Q20 vs Nubia Z11 Specs

Specs
BlackBerry Classic Q20Nubia Z11  
Screen Size 3.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP16MP  
RAM 2GB6GB  
Battery Capacity 2515mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP8MP  

BlackBerry Classic Q20 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The keyboard is classic BlackBerry and is excellent for typing
  • Excellent call reception
  • BlackBerry Assistant is useful
  • Long battery life
The Bad
  • Camera is bad in low light conditions
  • Touchscreen is cramped which makes hitting a touch point challenging
  • Trackpad is not all that useful
  • No Google Play Services so plenty of Android apps do not function

Nubia Z11 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good looking phone with solid build quality
  • Gaming and overall performance is good
  • Fingerprint scanner is accurate
  • Awesome viewing angles and brightness
  • Bezel-less display looks brilliant
The Bad
  • It can be little slippery at times
  • Sound output is pretty quiet
  • Full HD display; QHD would have been better

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare BlackBerry Classic Q20 with Nubia Z11. When you see BlackBerry Classic Q20 Vs Nubia Z11 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how BlackBerry Classic Q20 stands against Nubia Z11 and which one you should buy. The best price of BlackBerry Classic Q20 is currently Rs. 18,600. The lowest price for Nubia Z11 is Rs. 24,999. The prices for both these products were updated August 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page