Compare BlackBerry Classic Q20 vs Vivo V3

Feature Comparison

  • The 5 inch Screen Size on the Vivo V3 is 30.0% more
  • Vivo V3's got 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Vivo V3 has 3GB RAM, whereas BlackBerry Classic Q20 has 2GB RAM
 
BlackBerry Classic Q20
Vivo V3
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
37 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52 Value For Money Score
81 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
720 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
290.9 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 836 Qualcomm Snapdragon 616   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 225 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
BlackBerry Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
BlackBerry OS 10.3 Funtouch OS 2.5   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
131 x 72.4 x 10.2 143.6 x 71 x 7.5   
Weight
177 grams 138 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Gold, Rose Gold   
Build Material
- Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 23.51GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2515mAh 2550mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

BlackBerry Classic Q20 vs Vivo V3 Specs

Specs
BlackBerry Classic Q20Vivo V3  
Screen Size 3.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2515mAh2550mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP8MP  

BlackBerry Classic Q20 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The keyboard is classic BlackBerry and is excellent for typing
  • Excellent call reception
  • BlackBerry Assistant is useful
  • Long battery life
The Bad
  • Camera is bad in low light conditions
  • Touchscreen is cramped which makes hitting a touch point challenging
  • Trackpad is not all that useful
  • No Google Play Services so plenty of Android apps do not function

Vivo V3 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • 5 inch handy form factor with sharp display
  • Decent battery life and overall performance
  • Ample 32GB onboard storage with dedicated MicroSD card slot
  • Fast and accurate fingerprint scanner
The Bad
  • Runs on outdated Android 5.1 Lollipop with no update schedule
  • Average rear camera output

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare BlackBerry Classic Q20 with Vivo V3. When you see BlackBerry Classic Q20 Vs Vivo V3 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how BlackBerry Classic Q20 stands against Vivo V3 and which one you should buy. The best price of BlackBerry Classic Q20 is currently Rs. 18,600. The lowest price for Vivo V3 is Rs. 14,980. The prices for both these products were updated October 16, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page