Compare BlackBerry Q10 vs Gionee Elife E7 32GB

Feature Comparison

  • Gionee Elife E7 32GB has 43.0% more Screen Size
  • Gionee Elife E7 32GB has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Gionee Elife E7 32GB has 33.0% more RAM
 
BlackBerry Q10
Gionee Elife E7 32GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
46 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
56 Value For Money Score
79 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.1 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
720 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
328.5 PPI 400.5 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
- Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 2.2GHz   
Processor
TI OMAP 4470 Qualcomm Snapdragon 800   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
PowerVR SGX544 Adreno 330   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 16MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Autofocus, Geo-Tagging, Image Stabilization, Face Detection 1.34 µm Sensor, Sapphire lens   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
BlackBerry Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.2 Jelly Bean   
OS Detail
BlackBerry OS 10 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touch and Type Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
119.6 x 66.8 x 10.4 150.6 x 75.0 x 9.5   
Weight
139 grams 150 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Black, Blue, White   
Build Material
Polycarbonate -   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes -   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2100mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
- Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

BlackBerry Q10 vs Gionee Elife E7 32GB Specs

Specs
BlackBerry Q10Gionee Elife E7 32GB  
Screen Size 3.1 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP16MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2100mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP8MP  

Gionee Elife E7 32GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The curved back ensures that the phone sits well in your palm
  • Beautiful display with excellent colour reproduction
  • Excellent rear and front facing cameras easily capable of challenging flagship devices
  • Good battery life
  • Speakers on the phone are adequately loud and clear
The Bad
  • Amigo UI is very intensive on the RAM which leads to occasional stutters
  • No LTE support
  • No Dual SIM support
  • No expandable storage
  • Plastic-y back tends to pick up a lot of scratches in day to day usage

BlackBerry Q10 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The full QWERTY keyboard is exceptional
  • Good display with accurate colour reproduction
  • Battery life easily lasts you a day
  • BB10 has some interesting features that iOS and Android miss out
The Bad
  • Despite a good screen, the screen size is too small and has an awkward resolution
  • Below par camera performance
  • App ecosystem is weak on BlackBerry
  • Lacks FM Radio

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare BlackBerry Q10 with Gionee Elife E7 32GB. When you see BlackBerry Q10 Vs Gionee Elife E7 32GB comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how BlackBerry Q10 stands against Gionee Elife E7 32GB and which one you should buy. The best price of BlackBerry Q10 is currently Rs. 9,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 18, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page