Compare BlackBerry Q5 vs HTC Desire 626 LTE

Feature Comparison

  • HTC Desire 626 LTE has 5 inch Screen Size, whereas BlackBerry Q5 has 3.1 inch Screen Size
  • HTC Desire 626 LTE has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Both BlackBerry Q5 and HTC Desire 626 LTE have same RAM
 
BlackBerry Q5
HTC Desire 626 LTE
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
45 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
53 Value For Money Score
72 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.1 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
720 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
328.5 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.7GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6752   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
- -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 5MP   
Camera Details
2592x1944 Pixels Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
BlackBerry Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
BlackBerry OS 10 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touch and Type Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
120 x 66 x 10.8 146.9 x 70.9 x 8.2   
Weight
120 grams 140 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Red, Black, White Blue Lagoon, White Birch   
Build Material
- Polycarbonate   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 11.75GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2180mAh 2000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

BlackBerry Q5 vs HTC Desire 626 LTE Specs

Specs
BlackBerry Q5HTC Desire 626 LTE  
Screen Size 3.1 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2180mAh2000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP5MP  

BlackBerry Q5 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The physical keyboard is one of the best keyboards to type on mobile
  • Battery backup easily gets you by a whole day
  • Screen is bright and colours are true, good outdoor visibility
  • Due to the space between screen & top of keyboard, there is room for gestures unlike on Q10
The Bad
  • The squared aspect ratio of the screen is awkward and takes time to get used to
  • App ecosystem on Blackberry in general is poor
  • The design has no flair and the phone feels a little cheap
  • Performance is not the most fluid, as there are stutters in UI

HTC Desire 626 LTE Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Well designed and built
  • Display is sharp enough at 294PPI
  • Excellent user interface
  • 4G LTE supported
The Bad
  • Mediocre performance due to the chipset
  • Outdated Android version (Android 4.4 KitKat)
  • Below average battery life
  • Lots of bloatware

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare BlackBerry Q5 with HTC Desire 626 LTE. When you see BlackBerry Q5 Vs HTC Desire 626 LTE comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how BlackBerry Q5 stands against HTC Desire 626 LTE and which one you should buy. The best price of BlackBerry Q5 is currently Rs. 6,999. The lowest price for HTC Desire 626 LTE is Rs. 9,700. The prices for both these products were updated August 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page