Compare BlackBerry Q5 vs LeEco Le 1s Eco

Feature Comparison

  • LeEco Le 1s Eco's Screen Size is 43.0% more
  • LeEco Le 1s Eco has 75.0% more Internal Storage
  • The LeEco Le 1s Eco's RAM measures in at 3GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 33.0% more
 
BlackBerry Q5
LeEco Le 1s Eco
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
31 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
53 Value For Money Score
84 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.1 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
720 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
328.5 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6795T Helio X10   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
- PowerVR G6200   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 5MP   
Camera Details
2592x1944 Pixels Continuos Shooting, High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) , Digital Zoom, Auto Flash, Digital image stabilization, Face detection, Touch to focus,   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
BlackBerry Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
BlackBerry OS 10 EUI 5.5   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touch and Type Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
120 x 66 x 10.8 151.1 x 74.2 x 7.5   
Weight
120 grams 169 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Red, Black, White Gold   
Build Material
- Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 24.4GB   
Card Slot
Yes No   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2180mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

BlackBerry Q5 vs LeEco Le 1s Eco Specs

Specs
BlackBerry Q5LeEco Le 1s Eco  
Screen Size 3.1 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2180mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP5MP  

BlackBerry Q5 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The physical keyboard is one of the best keyboards to type on mobile
  • Battery backup easily gets you by a whole day
  • Screen is bright and colours are true, good outdoor visibility
  • Due to the space between screen & top of keyboard, there is room for gestures unlike on Q10
The Bad
  • The squared aspect ratio of the screen is awkward and takes time to get used to
  • App ecosystem on Blackberry in general is poor
  • The design has no flair and the phone feels a little cheap
  • Performance is not the most fluid, as there are stutters in UI

LeEco Le 1s Eco Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sturdy finish and premium metallic build
  • Vibrant 1080p Display
  • Smooth Performance
  • InfraRed Universal Remote Control Function
  • Fingerprint Sensor
The Bad
  • Average camera performance
  • Confusing User Interface

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare BlackBerry Q5 with LeEco Le 1s Eco. When you see BlackBerry Q5 Vs LeEco Le 1s Eco comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how BlackBerry Q5 stands against LeEco Le 1s Eco and which one you should buy. The best price of BlackBerry Q5 is currently Rs. 6,999. The prices for both these products were updated August 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page