Compare BlackBerry Q5 vs Micromax Canvas Selfie 3 Q348

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Micromax Canvas Selfie 3 Q348's is 35.0% more than BlackBerry Q5
  • Both BlackBerry Q5 and Micromax Canvas Selfie 3 Q348 have same Internal Storage
  • RAM of BlackBerry Q5's is 50.0% more than Micromax Canvas Selfie 3 Q348
 
BlackBerry Q5
Micromax Canvas Selfie 3 Q348
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
53 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
53 Value For Money Score
86 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.1 inch 4.8 inch   
Screen Resolution
720 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
328.5 PPI 306 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6582M   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 1GB   
Graphics
- Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 8MP   
Camera Details
2592x1944 Pixels -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
BlackBerry Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
BlackBerry OS 10 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touch and Type Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
120 x 66 x 10.8 141 x 68.8 x 7.75   
Weight
120 grams 110 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Red, Black, White Black, Purple, Blue, Yellow   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 4.75GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2180mAh 2300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

BlackBerry Q5 vs Micromax Canvas Selfie 3 Q348 Specs

Specs
BlackBerry Q5Micromax Canvas Selfie 3 Q348  
Screen Size 3.1 inch4.8 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 2GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2180mAh2300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP8MP  

BlackBerry Q5 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The physical keyboard is one of the best keyboards to type on mobile
  • Battery backup easily gets you by a whole day
  • Screen is bright and colours are true, good outdoor visibility
  • Due to the space between screen & top of keyboard, there is room for gestures unlike on Q10
The Bad
  • The squared aspect ratio of the screen is awkward and takes time to get used to
  • App ecosystem on Blackberry in general is poor
  • The design has no flair and the phone feels a little cheap
  • Performance is not the most fluid, as there are stutters in UI

Micromax Canvas Selfie 3 Q348 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Crisp and Vivid AMOLED display at 306PPI
  • Has Front LED Flash for low light selfies
The Bad
  • Average performance due to just 1GB of RAM
  • Lacks 4G connectivity

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare BlackBerry Q5 with Micromax Canvas Selfie 3 Q348. When you see BlackBerry Q5 Vs Micromax Canvas Selfie 3 Q348 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how BlackBerry Q5 stands against Micromax Canvas Selfie 3 Q348 and which one you should buy. The best price of BlackBerry Q5 is currently Rs. 8,390. The lowest price for Micromax Canvas Selfie 3 Q348 is Rs. 5,490. The prices for both these products were updated October 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page