Compare BlackBerry Z10 vs Panasonic P55 Novo 16GB

Feature Comparison

  • Panasonic P55 Novo 16GB's 5.3 inch Screen Size is more than BlackBerry Z10's 4.2 inch Screen Size
  • Both BlackBerry Z10 and Panasonic P55 Novo 16GB have same Internal Storage
  • Both BlackBerry Z10 and Panasonic P55 Novo 16GB have same RAM
 
BlackBerry Z10
Panasonic P55 Novo 16GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
63 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
64 Value For Money Score
78 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.2 inch 5.3 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 768 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
355.4 PPI 277 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MediaTek MT6592M   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 225 Mali-450 MP4   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Face Detection, Image Stabilization -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
BlackBerry Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
BlackBerry OS 10 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
130 x 65.6 x 9 mm 147.9 x 73.8 x 8.15   
Weight
138 grams 164 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Champagne Gold, Midnight Blue, Smoke Gray   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11.09GB 12.9GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1800mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

BlackBerry Z10 vs Panasonic P55 Novo 16GB Specs

Specs
BlackBerry Z10Panasonic P55 Novo 16GB  
Screen Size 4.2 inch5.3 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1800mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Panasonic P55 Novo 16GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Full HD video recording
  • 2GB of RAM helps in multitasking
The Bad
  • Only 8GB of internal storage
  • Average display sharpness at just 277PPI
  • Lacks 4G support
  • Average battery life

BlackBerry Z10 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The Messaging hub is excellent for power users as it aggregates all your messages in one place
  • Good looking device with a no-nonsense design
  • Crisp display with true colour reproduction
  • Camera does a good job in brightly lit conditions and taking macro shots
The Bad
  • Plastic body makes the phone feel a little cheap
  • The app ecosystem on the phone is not powerful, many Android and iOS apps are missing from BB10
  • Audio from the speaker is really poor and low
  • Booting up time on the device is a lot

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare BlackBerry Z10 with Panasonic P55 Novo 16GB. When you see BlackBerry Z10 Vs Panasonic P55 Novo 16GB comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how BlackBerry Z10 stands against Panasonic P55 Novo 16GB and which one you should buy. The best price of BlackBerry Z10 is currently Rs. 7,751. The lowest price for Panasonic P55 Novo 16GB is Rs. 6,428. The prices for both these products were updated August 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page