Compare BlackBerry Z10 vs Samsung Galaxy Grand Prime 4G

Feature Comparison

  • Samsung Galaxy Grand Prime 4G has 5 inch Screen Size and BlackBerry Z10 has 4.2 inch Screen Size
  • The 16GB Internal Storage on the BlackBerry Z10 is 50.0% more
  • BlackBerry Z10 has 50.0% more RAM
 
BlackBerry Z10
Samsung Galaxy Grand Prime 4G
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
78 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
57 Value For Money Score
70 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.2 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 768 pixels 960 x 540 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
355.4 PPI 220.3 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 1GB   
Graphics
Adreno 225 Adreno 306   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Face Detection, Image Stabilization -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
BlackBerry Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
BlackBerry OS 10 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
130 x 65.6 x 9 mm 144.8 x 72.1 x 8.6   
Weight
138 grams 156 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White White, Gold, Black   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11.09GB 4.6GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 64GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1800mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

BlackBerry Z10 vs Samsung Galaxy Grand Prime 4G Specs

Specs
BlackBerry Z10Samsung Galaxy Grand Prime 4G  
Screen Size 4.2 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 2GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1800mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy Grand Prime 4G Pros & Cons

The Good
  • 4G LTE Support
  • Decent Camera on the front and back
The Bad
  • Low Resolution Display ruins the viewing experience
  • Internal Storage is low at just 8GB

BlackBerry Z10 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The Messaging hub is excellent for power users as it aggregates all your messages in one place
  • Good looking device with a no-nonsense design
  • Crisp display with true colour reproduction
  • Camera does a good job in brightly lit conditions and taking macro shots
The Bad
  • Plastic body makes the phone feel a little cheap
  • The app ecosystem on the phone is not powerful, many Android and iOS apps are missing from BB10
  • Audio from the speaker is really poor and low
  • Booting up time on the device is a lot

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare BlackBerry Z10 with Samsung Galaxy Grand Prime 4G. When you see BlackBerry Z10 Vs Samsung Galaxy Grand Prime 4G comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how BlackBerry Z10 stands against Samsung Galaxy Grand Prime 4G and which one you should buy. The best price of BlackBerry Z10 is currently Rs. 8,880. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy Grand Prime 4G is Rs. 9,199. The prices for both these products were updated March 26, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page