Compare BlackBerry Z10 vs Samsung Z3 Tizen

Feature Comparison

  • Samsung Z3 Tizen has 5 inch Screen Size, whereas BlackBerry Z10 has 4.2 inch Screen Size
  • The BlackBerry Z10's Internal Storage measures in at 16GB. When compared to the other product's Internal Storage, it is 50.0% more
  • BlackBerry Z10's RAM is 50.0% more
 
BlackBerry Z10
Samsung Z3 Tizen
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
98 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
64 Value For Money Score
76 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.2 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 768 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
355.4 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Spreadtrum   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro Spreadtrum SC7730S   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 1GB   
Graphics
Adreno 225 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Face Detection, Image Stabilization Geo-tagging, Face Detection   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
BlackBerry Proprietary   
OS Version
- -   
OS Detail
BlackBerry OS 10 Proprietary   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
130 x 65.6 x 9 mm 141.6 x 70 x 7.9   
Weight
138 grams 137 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Gold, Black, Silver   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11.09GB 4.5GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1800mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

BlackBerry Z10 vs Samsung Z3 Tizen Specs

Specs
BlackBerry Z10Samsung Z3 Tizen  
Screen Size 4.2 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 2GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1800mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Samsung Z3 Tizen Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp and vivid AMOLED display with 294PPI
  • Decent battery life with features like Ultra Power Saving mode
  • Expandable storage up to 128GB
  • Smooth performance
The Bad
  • Lack of apps on Tizen OS
  • Below average camera performance
  • Lacks 4G support
  • No Auto-Brightness option

BlackBerry Z10 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The Messaging hub is excellent for power users as it aggregates all your messages in one place
  • Good looking device with a no-nonsense design
  • Crisp display with true colour reproduction
  • Camera does a good job in brightly lit conditions and taking macro shots
The Bad
  • Plastic body makes the phone feel a little cheap
  • The app ecosystem on the phone is not powerful, many Android and iOS apps are missing from BB10
  • Audio from the speaker is really poor and low
  • Booting up time on the device is a lot

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare BlackBerry Z10 with Samsung Z3 Tizen. When you see BlackBerry Z10 Vs Samsung Z3 Tizen comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how BlackBerry Z10 stands against Samsung Z3 Tizen and which one you should buy. The best price of BlackBerry Z10 is currently Rs. 5,531. The lowest price for Samsung Z3 Tizen is Rs. 8,900. The prices for both these products were updated October 20, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page