Compare Coolpad Cool 1 Dual 3GB vs Lava Z10

Feature Comparison

  • Coolpad Cool 1 Dual 3GB has 5.5 inch Screen Size and Lava Z10 has 5 inch Screen Size
  • The Coolpad Cool 1 Dual 3GB's got 32GB Internal Storage, while Lava Z10's Internal Storage is 16GB
  • Coolpad Cool 1 Dual 3GB has 33.0% more RAM
 
Coolpad Cool 1 Dual 3GB
Lava Z10
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
51 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
95 Value For Money Score
68 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.8GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
3GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 510 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Camera Details
+13MP Rear Camera, ISO setting , Exposure compensation, Self timer, Scene mode, Continuous shooting, Digital zoom, Geo tagging, Panorama, Touch focus, White balance setting, Face detection, HDR, Panorama 1.4 µm pixel size, geo-tagging, panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
4K Video Recording (2160p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual Rear Camera, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
EUI 5.8 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
USB Type C Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
152.00 x 74.80 x 8.20 143.2 x 71 x 8.4   
Weight
173 grams 148 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Silver, Gold Gold, Gray   
Build Material
Metal Unibody Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4000mAh 2620mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
Yes No   

Coolpad Cool 1 Dual 3GB vs Lava Z10 Specs

Specs
Coolpad Cool 1 Dual 3GBLava Z10  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 3GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 4000mAh2620mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

Coolpad Cool 1 Dual 3GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Snappy performance
  • Crisp & vibrant display
  • Excellent build quality
  • Good battery life with fast charging support
The Bad
  • Camera performance turns out to be average
  • Slightly heavy at 173gms

Lava Z10 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Dedicated Dual SIM & MicroSD card slots
  • Supports Reliance Jio network
  • Decent build quality
The Bad
  • Mediocre cameras
  • Poor battery life

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Coolpad Cool 1 Dual 3GB with Lava Z10. When you see Coolpad Cool 1 Dual 3GB Vs Lava Z10 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Coolpad Cool 1 Dual 3GB stands against Lava Z10 and which one you should buy. The best price of Coolpad Cool 1 Dual 3GB is currently Rs. 8,999. The lowest price for Lava Z10 is Rs. 8,891. The prices for both these products were updated October 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page