Compare Coolpad Note 3 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)

Feature Comparison

  • Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s got 16.0% more Screen Size
  • The Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has 32GB Internal Storage, which is 50.0% more
  • Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has 25.0% more RAM
 
Coolpad Note 3 Lite
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
76 Value For Money Score
95 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 6 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 367 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 4   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6735 Qualcomm Snapdragon 652   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 4GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP2 Adreno 510   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 16MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Camera Details
- 1/2.8" Sensor Size, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, OIS, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Cool UI 6.0 TouchWiz UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
140.8 x 70.4 x 8.9 161.7 x 80.9 x 7.9   
Weight
142 grams 210 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Champagne White, Black, Gold Gold, White, Black   
Build Material
Plastic Glass, Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
10.6GB 24GB   
Card Slot
Yes -   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2500mAh 5000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No Yes   

Coolpad Note 3 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) Specs

Specs
Coolpad Note 3 LiteSamsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)  
Screen Size 5 inch6 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP16MP  
RAM 3GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 2500mAh5000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  

Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Magnificent battery life
  • Solid build quality, looks premium
  • Gorgeous AMOLED display
  • Marvellous overall performance
  • Cameras perform excellent in good lighting conditions
The Bad
  • Huge overall footprint makes it uncomfortable to hold
  • Lacks gyroscope sensor
  • Not the snappiest fingerprint sensor

Coolpad Note 3 Lite Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Small size makes it comfortable to hold and use
  • Fingerprint Scanner helps secure phone and apps
  • 3GB RAM along with 16GB internal storage is impressive
The Bad
  • Camera Quality is average

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Coolpad Note 3 Lite with Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). When you see Coolpad Note 3 Lite Vs Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Coolpad Note 3 Lite stands against Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) is Rs. 22,499. The prices for both these products were updated August 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page