Compare Elephone P9000 vs Xiaomi Redmi 4 (3GB/32GB)

Feature Comparison

  • The Elephone P9000's Screen Size measures in at 5.5 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 9.0% more
  • Both Elephone P9000 and Xiaomi Redmi 4 (3GB/32GB) have same Internal Storage
  • The Elephone P9000's RAM measures in at 4GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 25.0% more
 
Elephone P9000
Xiaomi Redmi 4 (3GB/32GB)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
76 Value For Money Score
85 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
400.53 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
2GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6755 Helio P10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
4GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-T860 MP2 Adreno 505   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Face detection, Continuous shooting, White balance settings, Digital zoom, Digital Image stabilizatio, ISO Settings, Geo tagging, Exposure compensation, Panorama, Self timer, HDR, Scene mode, Touch focus, Macro mode, Raw Phase detection, Touch focus, Face detection, Smile detection, Geo-tagging, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 7.0 Nougat Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- MIUI 8   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 7.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
USB Type C Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
148.4 x 73.2 x 7.3 139 x 69.6 x 9   
Weight
145 grams 150 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Gold, Black, Silver   
Build Material
Metal, Plastic Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
256GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 4100mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
Yes -   

Elephone P9000 vs Xiaomi Redmi 4 (3GB/32GB) Specs

Specs
Elephone P9000Xiaomi Redmi 4 (3GB/32GB)  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 4GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh4100mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

Elephone P9000 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Premium design with thin-bezels and sandstone finish
  • Ships with Android 7.0 Nougat
  • Fast charging support
The Bad
  • LED notifications supports only white colour
  • Lacks dedicated MicroSD card slot

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Elephone P9000 with Xiaomi Redmi 4 (3GB/32GB). When you see Elephone P9000 Vs Xiaomi Redmi 4 (3GB/32GB) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Elephone P9000 stands against Xiaomi Redmi 4 (3GB/32GB) and which one you should buy. The best price of Elephone P9000 is currently Rs. 11,498. The lowest price for Xiaomi Redmi 4 (3GB/32GB) is Rs. 8,499. The prices for both these products were updated October 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page