Compare Gionee Elife E6 vs Intex Aqua S7

Feature Comparison

  • Both Gionee Elife E6 and Intex Aqua S7 have same Screen Size
  • Gionee Elife E6 has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • The Intex Aqua S7's RAM measures in at 3GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 33.0% more
 
Gionee Elife E6
Intex Aqua S7
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
57 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
65 Value For Money Score
75 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Asahi Dragontrail X Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
PowerVR Series 5XT Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, Panorama PIP mode, panorama mode, slow motion video,gesture shot, smile detection   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
142.5 x 69.4 x 7.9 142.50 x 72.50 x 8.70   
Weight
128 grams 150 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Champagne, Dark Blue, Rose Gold   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 10GB   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 64GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 3200mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Gionee Elife E6 vs Intex Aqua S7 Specs

Specs
Gionee Elife E6Intex Aqua S7  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh3200mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Intex Aqua S7 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp and vivid display
  • Good build quality and design
  • Battery life is quite good
  • Ships with Android 6.0 Marshmallow out of the box
The Bad
  • Average overall performance from the device
  • Tons of bloatware pre-installed
  • Output from either of the cameras is not great

Gionee Elife E6 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Unibody construction ensures there are no creeks when using the device
  • Excellent display with bright colours
  • Attractive looking phone that makes a style statement
The Bad
  • Complains of phone dying off after using it for a year
  • No expandable storage
  • Edges and corners are sharp which makes it difficult to use one-handed
  • Amigo UI is still not the best optimized, resulting in occasional lags and non-responsiveness

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Gionee Elife E6 with Intex Aqua S7. When you see Gionee Elife E6 Vs Intex Aqua S7 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Gionee Elife E6 stands against Intex Aqua S7 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Intex Aqua S7 is Rs. 8,999. The prices for both these products were updated August 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page