Compare Gionee Elife E6 vs Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM

Feature Comparison

  • Both Gionee Elife E6 and Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM have same Screen Size
  • The Internal Storage on Gionee Elife E6 is 75.0% more
  • Gionee Elife E6 has 50.0% more RAM
 
Gionee Elife E6
Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
76 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
65 Value For Money Score
56 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
- Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 200   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 1GB   
Graphics
PowerVR Series 5XT Adreno 302   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, Panorama Geo-Tagging   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 480p Video Recording   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Windows Phone   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean Windows Phone 8.1   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
142.5 x 69.4 x 7.9 144 x 73.7 x 9.4   
Weight
128 grams 152 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Cyan, Orange, White, Black   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 3.39GB   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2200mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Gionee Elife E6 vs Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM Specs

Specs
Gionee Elife E6Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 2GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2200mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Attractive design
  • Available in bright shiny colours, making the phone standout in the segment
  • Color reproduction on screen is good
  • User removable and replaceable back panel
The Bad
  • Substantial shutter lag makes the camera really difficult to use
  • Lacks HD Video recording on the rear camera
  • Overall the performance is not very snappy
  • Camera app takes a long time to load, which leads to you missing out on shots

Gionee Elife E6 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Unibody construction ensures there are no creeks when using the device
  • Excellent display with bright colours
  • Attractive looking phone that makes a style statement
The Bad
  • Complains of phone dying off after using it for a year
  • No expandable storage
  • Edges and corners are sharp which makes it difficult to use one-handed
  • Amigo UI is still not the best optimized, resulting in occasional lags and non-responsiveness

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Gionee Elife E6 with Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM. When you see Gionee Elife E6 Vs Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Gionee Elife E6 stands against Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated August 20, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page