Compare Gionee Elife E7 32GB vs HTC Desire 828 32GB

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Gionee Elife E7 32GB is the same as HTC Desire 828 32GB
  • Internal Storage of Gionee Elife E7 32GB is the same as HTC Desire 828 32GB
  • RAM of Gionee Elife E7 32GB is the same as HTC Desire 828 32GB
 
Gionee Elife E7 32GB
HTC Desire 828 32GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
92 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
79 Value For Money Score
73 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
400.5 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
2.2GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MediaTek MT6753   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 Mali-T720   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
16MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 4MP   
Camera Details
1.34 µm Sensor, Sapphire lens Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- Sense 6.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
150.6 x 75.0 x 9.5 157.7 x 78.9 x 7.9   
Weight
150 grams 148 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Blue, White White, Dark Gray   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 27GB   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 2TB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM + CDMA   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2500mAh 2800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Gionee Elife E7 32GB vs HTC Desire 828 32GB Specs

Specs
Gionee Elife E7 32GBHTC Desire 828 32GB  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 16MP13MP  
RAM 3GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2500mAh2800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP4MP  

Gionee Elife E7 32GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The curved back ensures that the phone sits well in your palm
  • Beautiful display with excellent colour reproduction
  • Excellent rear and front facing cameras easily capable of challenging flagship devices
  • Good battery life
  • Speakers on the phone are adequately loud and clear
The Bad
  • Amigo UI is very intensive on the RAM which leads to occasional stutters
  • No LTE support
  • No Dual SIM support
  • No expandable storage
  • Plastic-y back tends to pick up a lot of scratches in day to day usage

HTC Desire 828 32GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Rear camera has Optical Image Stabilisation (OIS)
  • Crisp Full HD display with a pixel density of 401 PPI
  • Decent battery life
  • Smooth User Interface by HTC
The Bad
  • Lots of bloatware pre-installed
  • No fast charging support
  • Lacks a fingerprint sensor

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Gionee Elife E7 32GB with HTC Desire 828 32GB. When you see Gionee Elife E7 32GB Vs HTC Desire 828 32GB comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Gionee Elife E7 32GB stands against HTC Desire 828 32GB and which one you should buy. The lowest price for HTC Desire 828 32GB is Rs. 12,320. The prices for both these products were updated August 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page