Compare Gionee Elife E7 16GB vs Lenovo Phab

Feature Comparison

  • Lenovo Phab's Screen Size is 21.0% more
  • Both Gionee Elife E7 16GB and Lenovo Phab have same Internal Storage
  • Both Gionee Elife E7 16GB and Lenovo Phab have same RAM
 
Gionee Elife E7 16GB
Lenovo Phab
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
73 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
79 Value For Money Score
69 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 6.98 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
400.5 PPI 210.4 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
2.2GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
16MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Camera Details
1.34 µm Sensor, Sapphire lens -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- Vibe UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
150.6 x 75.0 x 9.5 186 x 97 x 8.9   
Weight
150 grams 250 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White, Blue Tuxedo Black   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 23.91GB   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 64GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2500mAh 4250mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Gionee Elife E7 16GB vs Lenovo Phab Specs

Specs
Gionee Elife E7 16GBLenovo Phab  
Screen Size 5.5 inch6.98 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 16MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2500mAh4250mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

Lenovo Phab Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Huge display gives a great multimedia experience
  • Great battery life with 4250mAh unit
  • 4G LTE enabled
  • Expandable storage up to 64GB
The Bad
  • Below average display quality with just 210PPI
  • Mediocre performance with a chipset for budget devices
  • Not that great camera output
  • Huge size for comfortable usage as a mobile device

Gionee Elife E7 16GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The curved back ensures that the phone sits well in your palm
  • Beautiful display with excellent colour reproduction
  • Excellent rear and front facing cameras easily capable of challenging flagship devices
  • Good battery life
  • Speakers on the phone are adequately loud and clear
The Bad
  • Amigo UI is very intensive on the RAM which leads to a lot of stutters with just 2GB of RAM
  • No LTE support
  • No Dual SIM support
  • Lack of expandable storage means that 16GB of internal storage is inadequate
  • Plastic-y back tends to pick up a lot of scratches in day to day usage

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Gionee Elife E7 16GB with Lenovo Phab. When you see Gionee Elife E7 16GB Vs Lenovo Phab comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Gionee Elife E7 16GB stands against Lenovo Phab and which one you should buy. The best price of Gionee Elife E7 16GB is currently Rs. 14,999. The prices for both these products were updated August 18, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page