Compare Gionee Elife E7 16GB vs Samsung Galaxy Core 2

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Gionee Elife E7 16GB's is 18.0% more than Samsung Galaxy Core 2
  • The Gionee Elife E7 16GB's got 16GB Internal Storage, while Samsung Galaxy Core 2's Internal Storage is 4GB
  • The RAM on Gionee Elife E7 16GB is 62.0% more
 
Gionee Elife E7 16GB
Samsung Galaxy Core 2
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
18 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
79 Value For Money Score
49 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 4.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 800 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
400.5 PPI 207.3 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm -   
Processor Speed
2.2GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 -   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 768MB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
16MP 5MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 0.3MP   
Camera Details
1.34 µm Sensor, Sapphire lens Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean -   
OS Detail
- Android (4.4)   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
150.6 x 75.0 x 9.5 130.3 x 68 x 9.8   
Weight
150 grams 138 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White, Blue Black, White   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 4GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 2GB   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 64GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2500mAh 2000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Gionee Elife E7 16GB vs Samsung Galaxy Core 2 Specs

Specs
Gionee Elife E7 16GBSamsung Galaxy Core 2  
Screen Size 5.5 inch4.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 16MP5MP  
RAM 2GB768MB  
Battery Capacity 2500mAh2000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP0.3MP  

Samsung Galaxy Core 2 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Compact design
  • 3G connectivity
  • Dedicated Dual SIM slot and Micro SD expansion slot
The Bad
  • Poor battery life
  • Complains of poor touch calibration
  • Slow and sluggish performance

Gionee Elife E7 16GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The curved back ensures that the phone sits well in your palm
  • Beautiful display with excellent colour reproduction
  • Excellent rear and front facing cameras easily capable of challenging flagship devices
  • Good battery life
  • Speakers on the phone are adequately loud and clear
The Bad
  • Amigo UI is very intensive on the RAM which leads to a lot of stutters with just 2GB of RAM
  • No LTE support
  • No Dual SIM support
  • Lack of expandable storage means that 16GB of internal storage is inadequate
  • Plastic-y back tends to pick up a lot of scratches in day to day usage

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Gionee Elife E7 16GB with Samsung Galaxy Core 2. When you see Gionee Elife E7 16GB Vs Samsung Galaxy Core 2 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Gionee Elife E7 16GB stands against Samsung Galaxy Core 2 and which one you should buy. The best price of Gionee Elife E7 16GB is currently Rs. 16,400. The prices for both these products were updated August 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page