Compare Gionee Elife E7 16GB vs Samsung Galaxy J5 Prime (32GB)

Feature Comparison

  • Gionee Elife E7 16GB has 5.5 inch Screen Size, whereas Samsung Galaxy J5 Prime (32GB) has 5 inch Screen Size
  • The 32GB Internal Storage on the Samsung Galaxy J5 Prime (32GB) is 50.0% more
  • The 3GB RAM on the Samsung Galaxy J5 Prime (32GB) is 33.0% more
 
Gionee Elife E7 16GB
Samsung Galaxy J5 Prime (32GB)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
79 Value For Money Score
82 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD -   
Pixel Density
400.5 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Samsung Exynos   
Processor Speed
2.2GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 Exynos 7570   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 Mali-T830   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
16MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Camera Details
1.34 µm Sensor, Sapphire lens -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- TouchWiz UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
150.6 x 75.0 x 9.5 142.8 x 69.5 x 8.1   
Weight
150 grams 143 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White, Blue Black, Gold   
Build Material
- Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2500mAh 2400mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Gionee Elife E7 16GB vs Samsung Galaxy J5 Prime (32GB) Specs

Specs
Gionee Elife E7 16GBSamsung Galaxy J5 Prime (32GB)  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 16MP8MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2500mAh2400mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

Gionee Elife E7 16GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The curved back ensures that the phone sits well in your palm
  • Beautiful display with excellent colour reproduction
  • Excellent rear and front facing cameras easily capable of challenging flagship devices
  • Good battery life
  • Speakers on the phone are adequately loud and clear
The Bad
  • Amigo UI is very intensive on the RAM which leads to a lot of stutters with just 2GB of RAM
  • No LTE support
  • No Dual SIM support
  • Lack of expandable storage means that 16GB of internal storage is inadequate
  • Plastic-y back tends to pick up a lot of scratches in day to day usage

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Gionee Elife E7 16GB with Samsung Galaxy J5 Prime (32GB). When you see Gionee Elife E7 16GB Vs Samsung Galaxy J5 Prime (32GB) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Gionee Elife E7 16GB stands against Samsung Galaxy J5 Prime (32GB) and which one you should buy. The best price of Gionee Elife E7 16GB is currently Rs. 14,999. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy J5 Prime (32GB) is Rs. 13,490. The prices for both these products were updated August 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page