Compare Gionee Elife S Plus vs HTC Desire 828 32GB

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Gionee Elife S Plus is the same as HTC Desire 828 32GB
  • HTC Desire 828 32GB has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Both Gionee Elife S Plus and HTC Desire 828 32GB have same RAM
 
Gionee Elife S Plus
HTC Desire 828 32GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
97 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
76 Value For Money Score
73 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6753 MediaTek MT6753   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP3 Mali-T720   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 4MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Amigo 3.1 Sense 6.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
USB Type C Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
155 x 76.4 x 7.5 157.7 x 78.9 x 7.9   
Weight
158 grams 148 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Blue, White, Gold White, Dark Gray   
Build Material
Metal, Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 27GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 2TB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM + CDMA   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3150mAh 2800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Gionee Elife S Plus vs HTC Desire 828 32GB Specs

Specs
Gionee Elife S PlusHTC Desire 828 32GB  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 3GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3150mAh2800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP4MP  

Gionee Elife S Plus Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Overall the phone is sleek and feels light
  • Comes with USB Type-C so is future proof
  • Removable back panel and battery pack
  • The speaker on the phone is loud and really clear
The Bad
  • The plastic-y build does not inspire confidence in the product
  • The glossy finish of the back panel picks up a lot of smudges
  • Lacks NFC
  • Lacks a Full HD display

HTC Desire 828 32GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Rear camera has Optical Image Stabilisation (OIS)
  • Crisp Full HD display with a pixel density of 401 PPI
  • Decent battery life
  • Smooth User Interface by HTC
The Bad
  • Lots of bloatware pre-installed
  • No fast charging support
  • Lacks a fingerprint sensor

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Gionee Elife S Plus with HTC Desire 828 32GB. When you see Gionee Elife S Plus Vs HTC Desire 828 32GB comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Gionee Elife S Plus stands against HTC Desire 828 32GB and which one you should buy. The best price of Gionee Elife S Plus is currently Rs. 12,990. The lowest price for HTC Desire 828 32GB is Rs. 12,320. The prices for both these products were updated August 18, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page