Compare Gionee Elife S5.5 vs Gionee F103 2GB RAM

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Gionee Elife S5.5 is the same as Gionee F103 2GB RAM
  • Both Gionee Elife S5.5 and Gionee F103 2GB RAM have same Internal Storage
  • RAM of Gionee Elife S5.5 is the same as Gionee F103 2GB RAM
 
Gionee Elife S5.5
Gionee F103 2GB RAM
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
88 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
71 Value For Money Score
74 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Asahi Dragontrail Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6592 MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-450 MP4 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, touch focus, face/smile detection, panorama, HDR Geo-tagging, Autofocus, Macro Mode, Continuous Shooting, Digital Zoom, Digital Image Stabilization, Panorama, HDR, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection,   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
145.1 x 70.2 x 5.6 146 x 70.3 x 7.95   
Weight
133 grams 140 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black, Blue Black, White   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
10GB 9.38GB   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2300mAh 2400mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Gionee Elife S5.5 vs Gionee F103 2GB RAM Specs

Specs
Gionee Elife S5.5Gionee F103 2GB RAM  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2300mAh2400mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Gionee F103 2GB RAM Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Lightweight Design
The Bad
  • Average Camera Output
  • Average Performance

Gionee Elife S5.5 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Gorgeous slim design of the phone
  • Despite glass front and back, the phone feels solid in the hand
  • The display on the phone is fantastic, with good colour reproduction
  • Snappy camera
The Bad
  • Amigo UI is a major memory hog
  • The phone gets hot when subjected to day to day tasks
  • Battery life can be eccentric, primarily due to heating issues
  • Video recording is not the best as the phone drops a lot of frames when recording

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Gionee Elife S5.5 with Gionee F103 2GB RAM. When you see Gionee Elife S5.5 Vs Gionee F103 2GB RAM comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Gionee Elife S5.5 stands against Gionee F103 2GB RAM and which one you should buy. The best price of Gionee Elife S5.5 is currently Rs. 22,599. The lowest price for Gionee F103 2GB RAM is Rs. 8,995. The prices for both these products were updated March 24, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page