Compare Gionee Elife S5.5 vs Micromax Canvas Play 4G Q469

Feature Comparison

  • Micromax Canvas Play 4G Q469 has 9.0% more Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of Gionee Elife S5.5 is the same as Micromax Canvas Play 4G Q469
  • RAM of Gionee Elife S5.5 is the same as Micromax Canvas Play 4G Q469
 
Gionee Elife S5.5
Micromax Canvas Play 4G Q469
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
83 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
80 Value For Money Score
73 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6592 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-450 MP4 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, touch focus, face/smile detection, panorama, HDR -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean -   
OS Detail
- Android (5.1)   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
145.1 x 70.2 x 5.6 164 x 94 x 42   
Weight
133 grams 100 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black, Blue Gray   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
10GB 11.55GB   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2300mAh 2820mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Gionee Elife S5.5 vs Micromax Canvas Play 4G Q469 Specs

Specs
Gionee Elife S5.5Micromax Canvas Play 4G Q469  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2300mAh2820mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Micromax Canvas Play 4G Q469 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Corning Gorilla Glass 3 protection
  • Full HD video recording capability
  • Decent battery life
The Bad
  • Average display sharpness
  • Mediocre performance

Gionee Elife S5.5 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Gorgeous slim design of the phone
  • Despite glass front and back, the phone feels solid in the hand
  • The display on the phone is fantastic, with good colour reproduction
  • Snappy camera
The Bad
  • Amigo UI is a major memory hog
  • The phone gets hot when subjected to day to day tasks
  • Battery life can be eccentric, primarily due to heating issues
  • Video recording is not the best as the phone drops a lot of frames when recording

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Gionee Elife S5.5 with Micromax Canvas Play 4G Q469. When you see Gionee Elife S5.5 Vs Micromax Canvas Play 4G Q469 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Gionee Elife S5.5 stands against Micromax Canvas Play 4G Q469 and which one you should buy. The best price of Gionee Elife S5.5 is currently Rs. 19,999. The lowest price for Micromax Canvas Play 4G Q469 is Rs. 7,739. The prices for both these products were updated October 24, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page