Compare Gionee Elife S7 vs Lenovo Vibe P1

Feature Comparison

  • Lenovo Vibe P1 has 5.0% more Screen Size
  • Lenovo Vibe P1's Internal Storage is 50.0% more
  • RAM of Gionee Elife S7 is the same as Lenovo Vibe P1
 
Gionee Elife S7
Lenovo Vibe P1
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
85 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
78 Value For Money Score
85 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.2 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
423.6 PPI 400.5 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6752 Qualcomm Snapdragon 615   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-T760 MP2 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
148.8 X 72.4 X 5.5 152.9 x 75.6 x 9.9   
Weight
125 grams 187 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Silver, Grey   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
10GB 23.77GB   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2700mAh 4900mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- Yes   

Gionee Elife S7 vs Lenovo Vibe P1 Specs

Specs
Gionee Elife S7Lenovo Vibe P1  
Screen Size 5.2 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2700mAh4900mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

Gionee Elife S7 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Beautiful and ergonomic design
  • The external speaker is really loud and clear
  • Long lasting battery life
  • Beautiful Super AMOLED display
The Bad
  • Prone to getting hot when doing memory intensive tasks
  • The glass back can crack if not handled with care
  • Amigo UI is not optimized resulting in stutters and lags
  • Lacks Micro SD card support

Lenovo Vibe P1 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Amazing battery life, huge 4900mAh battery
  • Good display with Gorilla Glass Protection
  • Fingerprint scanner
  • Dual 4G SIM Support
The Bad
  • Outdoor legibility is poor
  • Heavy to hold
  • Camera performance is hit or miss

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Gionee Elife S7 with Lenovo Vibe P1. When you see Gionee Elife S7 Vs Lenovo Vibe P1 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Gionee Elife S7 stands against Lenovo Vibe P1 and which one you should buy. The best price of Gionee Elife S7 is currently Rs. 25,999. The lowest price for Lenovo Vibe P1 is Rs. 15,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page