Compare Gionee Marathon M5 Lite vs LYF Flame 2

Feature Comparison

  • Gionee Marathon M5 Lite has 5 inch Screen Size and LYF Flame 2 has 4 inch Screen Size
  • Gionee Marathon M5 Lite's Internal Storage is 75.0% more
  • Gionee Marathon M5 Lite has 66.0% more RAM
 
Gionee Marathon M5 Lite
LYF Flame 2
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
58 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
80 Value For Money Score
77 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 4 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 800 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 233 PPI   
Screen Protection
Asahi Dragontrail Glass -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.1GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6735 MediaTek MT6735M   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
3GB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP2 Mali-T720   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 2MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, Panorama, HDR Geo-tagging, touch focus, panorama, HDR, Zoom 4X, Picture in picture, multi angle view mode, ASD (Auto-Scene Detection), Face Detection, Video Snapshot, Smile Shot and Gesture Capture, HD Recording (720p), 30 Frames Per Second   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
143 x 69.9 x 8.5 124.2 x 64.8 x 10.3   
Weight
183 grams 145 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gold, Blue, Black White, Black   
Build Material
Metal Unibody Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 2 Years   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year standard + 1 Year additional on registering with LYFCare App   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
24.78GB 4.1GB   
Card Slot
Yes, MicroSD -   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Mini (Normal) SIM, Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4000mAh 1500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No -   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Gionee Marathon M5 Lite vs LYF Flame 2 Specs

Specs
Gionee Marathon M5 LiteLYF Flame 2  
Screen Size 5 inch4 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  
RAM 3GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 4000mAh1500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP2MP  

Gionee Marathon M5 Lite Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp enough display with a pixel density of 294PPI and Asahi Dragontrail Glass protection
  • Ample 3GB of RAM for better multitasking experience
  • Excellent battery backup with the 4000mAh unit
  • 32GB of internal storage
  • Stunning Metal Unibody design
The Bad
  • Average processor performance
  • Still runs on oudated Android 5.1 Lollipop with lots of bloatware pre-installed
  • Average camera performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Gionee Marathon M5 Lite with LYF Flame 2. When you see Gionee Marathon M5 Lite Vs LYF Flame 2 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Gionee Marathon M5 Lite stands against LYF Flame 2 and which one you should buy. The best price of Gionee Marathon M5 Lite is currently Rs. 10,990. The prices for both these products were updated August 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page