Compare Gionee Marathon M5 Plus vs HTC Desire 830

Feature Comparison

  • The Gionee Marathon M5 Plus has 6 inch Screen Size, which is 8.0% more
  • The 64GB Internal Storage on the Gionee Marathon M5 Plus is 50.0% more
  • RAM of Gionee Marathon M5 Plus is the same as HTC Desire 830
 
Gionee Marathon M5 Plus
HTC Desire 830
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
75 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
84 Value For Money Score
71 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
6 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED -   
Pixel Density
368 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6753 MediaTek MT6753   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 Mali-T720 MP3   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 4MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, Panorama, HDR Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Amigo UI 3.1 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
USB Type C Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
160.90 x 81.20 x 8.40 157.5 x 78.9 x 7.8   
Weight
208 grams -   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Polar Gold, Champagne Gold White Blue, White Red, Black Gold   
Build Material
Metal Unibody Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
64GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
53.71GB -   
Card Slot
Yes -   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Single   
Network Type
GSM + CDMA GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
5020mAh 2800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Gionee Marathon M5 Plus vs HTC Desire 830 Specs

Specs
Gionee Marathon M5 PlusHTC Desire 830  
Screen Size 6 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 3GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 5020mAh2800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP4MP  

Gionee Marathon M5 Plus Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Huge 5020mAh battery keeps it powered on for a really long time
  • Premium metal build
  • Dual SIM, supports 4G and VOLTE
  • Really snappy fingerprint scanner
  • Comes with the latest USB Type C port, with fast charging
The Bad
  • The 6 inch display may not be appealing to everyone as it makes the phone really big
  • The phone feels bulky and heavy
  • Camera performance is average
  • The device tends to get a little warm when streaming videos for a long time
  • The plastic contacts on the back on top and bottom of the device feel cheap

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Gionee Marathon M5 Plus with HTC Desire 830. When you see Gionee Marathon M5 Plus Vs HTC Desire 830 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Gionee Marathon M5 Plus stands against HTC Desire 830 and which one you should buy. The best price of Gionee Marathon M5 Plus is currently Rs. 20,599. The lowest price for HTC Desire 830 is Rs. 12,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page