Compare Gionee Marathon M5 vs Samsung Galaxy On5

Feature Comparison

  • The Gionee Marathon M5's got 5.5 inch Screen Size, while Samsung Galaxy On5's Screen Size is 5 inch
  • Internal Storage of Gionee Marathon M5's is 50.0% more than Samsung Galaxy On5
  • The Gionee Marathon M5 has 2GB RAM, which is 25.0% more
 
Gionee Marathon M5
Samsung Galaxy On5
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
50 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
75 Value For Money Score
67 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Samsung Exynos   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6735 Exynos 3475   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 1.5GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T720 MP1   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, Panorama Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
152 x 76 x 8.5 142.3 x 72.1 x 8.5   
Weight
211 grams 149 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Blue Black, Gold   
Build Material
Metal Plastic   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 4GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
6020mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Gionee Marathon M5 vs Samsung Galaxy On5 Specs

Specs
Gionee Marathon M5Samsung Galaxy On5  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 2GB1.5GB  
Battery Capacity 6020mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy On5 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good display with adequate sharpness & brightness
  • Comfortable to hold
  • Acceptable battery life
The Bad
  • Inadequate RAM & internal storage
  • Laggy upon heavy usage
  • Rear camera performance not satisfactory
  • Average build quality
  • No ambient light sensor (auto-brightness)

Gionee Marathon M5 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The metallic build quality is really reassuring and the phone feels very solid
  • Exceedingly good battery life
  • The colours on the AMOLED display are really deep with good contrasts
  • Comes with IR blaster
The Bad
  • Amigo UI still has niggling issues with RAM management and bad translation
  • Lacks a Full HD display
  • The phone feels bulky to use
  • The camera really struggles in low light conditions

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Gionee Marathon M5 with Samsung Galaxy On5. When you see Gionee Marathon M5 Vs Samsung Galaxy On5 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Gionee Marathon M5 stands against Samsung Galaxy On5 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy On5 is Rs. 7,490. The prices for both these products were updated February 26, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page