Compare HTC Desire 820G Plus vs Asus ZenFone 2 Laser 2GB/16GB (ZE500KL)

Feature Comparison

  • The HTC Desire 820G Plus's Screen Size measures in at 5.5 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 9.0% more
  • Both HTC Desire 820G Plus and Asus ZenFone 2 Laser 2GB/16GB (ZE500KL) have same Internal Storage
  • The Asus ZenFone 2 Laser 2GB/16GB (ZE500KL) has 2GB RAM, which is 50.0% more
 
HTC Desire 820G Plus
Asus ZenFone 2 Laser 2GB/16GB (ZE500KL)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
68 Value For Money Score
69 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 4   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6592 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-450 MP4 Adreno 306   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Laser Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat -   
OS Detail
- Android (5.0)   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
157.7 x 78.74 x 7.74 143.7 x 71.5 x 10.5   
Weight
155 grams 140 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Santorini White, Milkyway Grey White, Black, Red, Gold   
Build Material
- Polycarbonate   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 2070mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire 820G Plus vs Asus ZenFone 2 Laser 2GB/16GB (ZE500KL) Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 820G PlusAsus ZenFone 2 Laser 2GB/16GB (ZE500KL)  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh2070mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

Asus ZenFone 2 Laser 2GB/16GB (ZE500KL) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Fast and accurate Autofocus
  • Good camera especially in indoor environment
  • Gorilla Glass 4 protection
The Bad
  • Average battery life
  • Outdoor shots from the camera tend to have washed out colours
  • Display is not the brightest which results in below average readability in direct sun
  • Plenty of pre-installed apps that cannot be uninstalled

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 820G Plus with Asus ZenFone 2 Laser 2GB/16GB (ZE500KL). When you see HTC Desire 820G Plus Vs Asus ZenFone 2 Laser 2GB/16GB (ZE500KL) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 820G Plus stands against Asus ZenFone 2 Laser 2GB/16GB (ZE500KL) and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 820G Plus is currently Rs. 8,699. The lowest price for Asus ZenFone 2 Laser 2GB/16GB (ZE500KL) is Rs. 8,499. The prices for both these products were updated August 20, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page