Compare HTC Desire 10 pro vs Meizu M3S (3GB/32GB)

Feature Comparison

  • The HTC Desire 10 pro's got 5.5 inch Screen Size, while Meizu M3S (3GB/32GB)'s Screen Size is 5 inch
  • The HTC Desire 10 pro's got 64GB Internal Storage, while Meizu M3S (3GB/32GB)'s Internal Storage is 32GB
  • HTC Desire 10 pro's RAM is 25.0% more
 
HTC Desire 10 pro
Meizu M3S (3GB/32GB)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
90 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
78 Value For Money Score
78 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
400 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.8GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6755 Helio P10 MediaTek MT6750   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
4GB 3GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T860 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
20MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
13MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, HDR, panorama Continuous shooting, Digital zoon, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Touch Focus   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, OIS, Dual Tone LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
HTC Sense FlyMe OS 5.1   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
156.5 x 76 x 7.86 69.9 x 141.9 x 8.3   
Weight
165 grams 138 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Polar White Gold, Gray, Silver, Pink   
Build Material
Plastic Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
64GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
2TB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 3020mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
Yes -   

HTC Desire 10 pro vs Meizu M3S (3GB/32GB) Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 10 proMeizu M3S (3GB/32GB)  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 20MP13MP  
RAM 4GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh3020mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 13MP5MP  

Meizu M3S (3GB/32GB) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Crisp display
  • Well built and handy form factor
  • Fingerprint sensor embedded in the home button
The Bad
  • Runs on dated Android 5.1 Lollipop
  • Hybrid second slot
  • Average overall performance

HTC Desire 10 pro Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Crisp & vivid display
  • Appealing looks & build
  • Camera on either sides perform well
  • Polished Sense UI over Android Marshmallow
The Bad
  • Median overall performance for the price
  • Lacks NFC
  • Rear of the device easily prone to get scuffs & scratches

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 10 pro with Meizu M3S (3GB/32GB). When you see HTC Desire 10 pro Vs Meizu M3S (3GB/32GB) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 10 pro stands against Meizu M3S (3GB/32GB) and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 10 pro is currently Rs. 19,567. The prices for both these products were updated August 24, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page