Compare HTC Desire 600c Dual Sim vs BlackBerry Porsche Design P9982

Feature Comparison

  • The 4.5 inch Screen Size on the HTC Desire 600c Dual Sim is 6.0% more
  • The BlackBerry Porsche Design P9982's got 64GB Internal Storage, while HTC Desire 600c Dual Sim's Internal Storage is 8GB
  • BlackBerry Porsche Design P9982 has 50.0% more RAM
 
HTC Desire 600c Dual Sim
BlackBerry Porsche Design P9982
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
88 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52 Value For Money Score
53 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 4.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 540 pixels 1280 x 768 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
244.8 PPI 355.4 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Dual-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 203 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1.6MP 2MP   
Camera Details
Continuous Shooting, HTC Video Pic, Light Sensitivity, High Burst Mode Digital Image Stabilization, Face Detection, Geo Tagging, High Dynamic Range Mode (HDR), Image Viewer   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android BlackBerry   
OS Version
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean -   
OS Detail
Android (4.1) BlackBerry OS 10.2   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
134.9 x 66.78 x 9.55 131 x 65.6 x 9.5   
Weight
127 grams 140 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- -   
Build Material
- Metal, Leather   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 64GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Single   
Network Type
GSM + CDMA GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1860mAh 1800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire 600c Dual Sim vs BlackBerry Porsche Design P9982 Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 600c Dual SimBlackBerry Porsche Design P9982  
Screen Size 4.5 inch4.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1860mAh1800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1.6MP2MP  

BlackBerry Porsche Design P9982 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Every user using the phone gets an exclusive BB Pin
  • Premium build quality and exquisite feel
  • Porsche branding makes the device a luxury and a premium product to own
  • 64GB internal memory is a welcome change from the BB Z10's only 16GB
The Bad
  • A luxury product so will be grossly overpriced for what it offers
  • Poor third party app support
  • The phone stutters when playing a lot of videos or doing memory intensive tasks
  • Lacks the traditional BlackBerry QWERTY keyboard

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 600c Dual Sim with BlackBerry Porsche Design P9982. When you see HTC Desire 600c Dual Sim Vs BlackBerry Porsche Design P9982 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 600c Dual Sim stands against BlackBerry Porsche Design P9982 and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 600c Dual Sim is currently Rs. 27,999. The lowest price for BlackBerry Porsche Design P9982 is Rs. 79,999. The prices for both these products were updated August 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page