Compare HTC Desire 600c Dual Sim vs BlackBerry Priv

Feature Comparison

  • BlackBerry Priv's Screen Size is 16.0% more
  • The Internal Storage on BlackBerry Priv is 75.0% more
  • BlackBerry Priv has 3GB RAM and HTC Desire 600c Dual Sim has 1GB RAM
 
HTC Desire 600c Dual Sim
BlackBerry Priv
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
60 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52 Value For Money Score
60 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5.4 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 540 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
244.8 PPI 543.9 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 4   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Hexa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 203 Adreno 418   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 18MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1.6MP 2MP   
Camera Details
Continuous Shooting, HTC Video Pic, Light Sensitivity, High Burst Mode Optical Image Stabilization, Phase Detection Autofocus, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, OIS, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.1) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touch and Type   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
134.9 x 66.78 x 9.55 147 x 77.2 x 9.4   
Weight
127 grams 192 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Black   
Build Material
- Polycarbonate   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 2TB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Single   
Network Type
GSM + CDMA GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1860mAh 3410mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire 600c Dual Sim vs BlackBerry Priv Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 600c Dual SimBlackBerry Priv  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5.4 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP18MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1860mAh3410mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1.6MP2MP  

BlackBerry Priv Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The device comes with both a Touchscreen and Physical QWERTY keyboard
  • Finally a BlackBerry device running Android
  • The slide out mechanism on the phone is a nice throwback to good old days
  • Premium build quality and feels solid all around
  • Subtle tweaks like bringing BlackBerry Hub to Android are really useful
The Bad
  • Lacks modern day features like fingerprint scanner
  • With the keyboard out, the phone feels top heavy and is not best for one handed usage
  • Front camera lacks details
  • Despite close to stock Android, the performance is not the most fluid
  • Physical keyboard feels too narrow and squeezed

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 600c Dual Sim with BlackBerry Priv. When you see HTC Desire 600c Dual Sim Vs BlackBerry Priv comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 600c Dual Sim stands against BlackBerry Priv and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 600c Dual Sim is currently Rs. 27,999. The lowest price for BlackBerry Priv is Rs. 31,990. The prices for both these products were updated August 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page