Compare HTC Desire 616 Dual SIM vs Lenovo Vibe P1 Turbo

Feature Comparison

  • The 5.5 inch Screen Size on the Lenovo Vibe P1 Turbo is 9.0% more
  • Lenovo Vibe P1 Turbo has 87.0% more Internal Storage
  • The Lenovo Vibe P1 Turbo's got 3GB RAM, while HTC Desire 616 Dual SIM's RAM is 1GB
 
HTC Desire 616 Dual SIM
Lenovo Vibe P1 Turbo
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
49 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
63 Value For Money Score
86 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.4GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6592 Qualcomm Snapdragon 615   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-450 MP4 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Simultaneous HD Video & Image Recording, HDR Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
142 x 71.9 x 9.2 152.9 x 75.6 x 9.9   
Weight
150 grams 189 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Pearl White, Gray Graphite Grey, Gold, Platinum   
Build Material
Plastic Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2GB 23.87GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM, Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 5000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- Yes   

HTC Desire 616 Dual SIM vs Lenovo Vibe P1 Turbo Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 616 Dual SIMLenovo Vibe P1 Turbo  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh5000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

HTC Desire 616 Dual SIM Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good display quality, fairly sharp at 294PPI
  • Decent camera with Full HD video recording
The Bad
  • Average performance with just 1GB of RAM
  • Way outdated Android version (Jelly Bean 4.2)
  • Lacks 4G LTE support

Lenovo Vibe P1 Turbo Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp display with Gorilla Glass 3 protection
  • Massive 5000mAh battery with fast charging support
  • Metal Unibody design with fingerprint sensor
The Bad
  • Outdated Android version (5.1 Lollipop)
  • Slightly heavy, thanks to the huge battery

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 616 Dual SIM with Lenovo Vibe P1 Turbo. When you see HTC Desire 616 Dual SIM Vs Lenovo Vibe P1 Turbo comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 616 Dual SIM stands against Lenovo Vibe P1 Turbo and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 616 Dual SIM is currently Rs. 9,300. The lowest price for Lenovo Vibe P1 Turbo is Rs. 9,499. The prices for both these products were updated October 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page