Compare HTC Desire 728G Dual SIM vs Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus

Feature Comparison

  • The Screen Size on HTC Desire 728G Dual SIM is 9.0% more
  • Both HTC Desire 728G Dual SIM and Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus have same Internal Storage
  • Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus's got 25.0% more RAM
 
HTC Desire 728G Dual SIM
Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
74 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
70 Value For Money Score
84 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 441 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6753 Qualcomm Snapdragon 616   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1.5GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-720 MP3 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- Vibe UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
157.90 x 77.84 x 7.87 142 x 71 x 8.2   
Weight
153 grams 142 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Purple Myst, Black, Gold, Black Gold, Silver, Dark Gray   
Build Material
- Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 10.5GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
2TB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2800mAh 2750mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire 728G Dual SIM vs Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 728G Dual SIMLenovo Vibe K5 Plus  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 1.5GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2800mAh2750mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Solid build quality with a compact design that is great for one handed usage
  • Thanks to Dolby Atmos powered dual speakers at the back, the audio output is good from the phone
  • The phone supports ANT VR headset that Lenovo sells separately
  • Sharp display with vibrant colour output
The Bad
  • The capacitive buttons below the display are not backlit
  • The chrome ring running around the phone picks up scratches easily
  • Battery really struggles to make past a whole day on moderate usage
  • There is no mention of any sort of protection on the display

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 728G Dual SIM with Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus. When you see HTC Desire 728G Dual SIM Vs Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 728G Dual SIM stands against Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 728G Dual SIM is currently Rs. 10,999. The lowest price for Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus is Rs. 8,499. The prices for both these products were updated August 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page