Compare HTC Desire 816 vs Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465

Feature Comparison

  • HTC Desire 816 has 5.5 inch Screen Size and Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 has 5 inch Screen Size
  • The Internal Storage on Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 is 50.0% more
  • Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465's RAM is 25.0% more
 
HTC Desire 816
Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
86 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
68 Value For Money Score
76 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 293.72 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Spreadtrum   
Processor Speed
1.6GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 Spreadtrum SC9832   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1.5GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Simultaneous HD Video and Image Recording, HDR -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
HTC Sense UI 6.0 Indus OS 2.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
156.6 x 78.7 x 8 143.5 x 71.6 x 8.65   
Weight
165 grams 145 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Gray, Orange Gold   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4.2GB 10.79GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM + CDMA GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 3900mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire 816 vs Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 816Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 1.5GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh3900mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp display at a decent 294PPI
  • Good build quality and design
  • 5 inch form factor makes it comfortable to hold and use single handedly
  • Inclusion of 12 local languages is a huge plus for Indian users
  • Decent battery life with average usage
The Bad
  • Not the best performance in the price range
  • Slow charging might frustrate some
  • Fingerprint sensor is not that great

HTC Desire 816 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Impressive sound output
  • Dedicated MicroSD card slot
  • Good battery backup
The Bad
  • Glossy back attracts smudges and fingerprints
  • Supports nano SIM cards only

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 816 with Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465. When you see HTC Desire 816 Vs Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 816 stands against Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 816 is currently Rs. 8,999. The lowest price for Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 is Rs. 7,402. The prices for both these products were updated August 18, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page