Compare HTC Desire 816 vs Panasonic Eluga Ray X

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of HTC Desire 816 is the same as Panasonic Eluga Ray X
  • Panasonic Eluga Ray X's Internal Storage is 75.0% more
  • The Panasonic Eluga Ray X's got 3GB RAM, while HTC Desire 816's RAM is 1.5GB
 
HTC Desire 816
Panasonic Eluga Ray X
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
63 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
68 Value For Money Score
79 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.6GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1.5GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Mali-T720   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Simultaneous HD Video and Image Recording, HDR Smart Action, Auto Focus, Burst Mode for Capture Images, Just-shut Mode: Select Best Images of a Moving Objects, Panaroma Images Supported, F-stop 2.2, 5P Lens, Pixel Size: 1.1 micrometer x 1.1 micrometer, 1/3.2 Sensor Size   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
HTC Sense UI 6.0 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
156.6 x 78.7 x 8 153.4 x 77.0 x 10.5   
Weight
165 grams 193 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Gray, Orange Space Gray, Gold, Rose Gold   
Build Material
Plastic Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4.2GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 64GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM + CDMA GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 4000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire 816 vs Panasonic Eluga Ray X Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 816Panasonic Eluga Ray X  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 1.5GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh4000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Panasonic Eluga Ray X Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Comes with AI assistant - ARBO
  • Both front and back LED flash
The Bad
  • Doesn't come with the latest Android Nougat

HTC Desire 816 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Impressive sound output
  • Dedicated MicroSD card slot
  • Good battery backup
The Bad
  • Glossy back attracts smudges and fingerprints
  • Supports nano SIM cards only

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 816 with Panasonic Eluga Ray X. When you see HTC Desire 816 Vs Panasonic Eluga Ray X comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 816 stands against Panasonic Eluga Ray X and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 816 is currently Rs. 19,999. The lowest price for Panasonic Eluga Ray X is Rs. 8,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 24, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page