Compare HTC Desire 816 vs Samsung Galaxy E5

Feature Comparison

  • HTC Desire 816 has 9.0% more Screen Size
  • Samsung Galaxy E5's 16GB Internal Storage is more than HTC Desire 816's 8GB Internal Storage
  • RAM of HTC Desire 816 is the same as Samsung Galaxy E5
 
HTC Desire 816
Samsung Galaxy E5
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
90 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
58 Value For Money Score
61 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.6GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 400   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1.5GB 1.5GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Adreno 305   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Simultaneous HD Video and Image Recording, HDR Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 4.3 Jelly Bean   
OS Detail
HTC Sense UI 6.0 -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 4.4   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
156.6 x 78.7 x 8 141.6 x 70.2 x 7.3   
Weight
165 grams 120 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Gray, Orange Black, White, Brown   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4.2GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 64GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM + CDMA GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire 816 vs Samsung Galaxy E5 Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 816Samsung Galaxy E5  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 1.5GB1.5GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP2MP  

Samsung Galaxy E5 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp AMOLED and well calibrated display
  • Decent battery life that should last through the day
The Bad
  • Mediocre performance
  • Quite an outdated Android version

HTC Desire 816 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Impressive sound output
  • Dedicated MicroSD card slot
  • Good battery backup
The Bad
  • Glossy back attracts smudges and fingerprints
  • Supports nano SIM cards only

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 816 with Samsung Galaxy E5. When you see HTC Desire 816 Vs Samsung Galaxy E5 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 816 stands against Samsung Galaxy E5 and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 816 is currently Rs. 19,999. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy E5 is Rs. 15,500. The prices for both these products were updated November 23, 2017.
Report an error on this page