Compare HTC Desire 816 vs Sony Xperia C5 Ultra Dual

Feature Comparison

  • The Sony Xperia C5 Ultra Dual's got 6 inch Screen Size, while HTC Desire 816's Screen Size is 5.5 inch
  • Sony Xperia C5 Ultra Dual has 16GB Internal Storage and HTC Desire 816 has 8GB Internal Storage
  • Sony Xperia C5 Ultra Dual's RAM is 25.0% more
 
HTC Desire 816
Sony Xperia C5 Ultra Dual
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
69 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
68 Value For Money Score
71 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 6 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 367.2 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.6GHz 1.7GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MediaTek MT6752   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1.5GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Mali-760 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Simultaneous HD Video and Image Recording, HDR Geotagging, HDR, Image Stabiliser,   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
HTC Sense UI 6.0 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
156.6 x 78.7 x 8 164.2 x 79.6 x 8.2   
Weight
165 grams 187 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Gray, Orange Black, Mint, White   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4.2GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 200GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM + CDMA GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 2930mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire 816 vs Sony Xperia C5 Ultra Dual Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 816Sony Xperia C5 Ultra Dual  
Screen Size 5.5 inch6 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 1.5GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh2930mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  

Sony Xperia C5 Ultra Dual Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The display has very thin bezels so is aesthetically pleasing
  • The front facing camera takes beautiful pictures with lots of details
  • Audio quality on the phone is really good
  • Audio quality on the phone is excellent
The Bad
  • The phone runs an older version of Android at launch with no information about updates
  • Lacks 4K video recording
  • Battery life on the device can be inconsistent

HTC Desire 816 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Impressive sound output
  • Dedicated MicroSD card slot
  • Good battery backup
The Bad
  • Glossy back attracts smudges and fingerprints
  • Supports nano SIM cards only

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 816 with Sony Xperia C5 Ultra Dual. When you see HTC Desire 816 Vs Sony Xperia C5 Ultra Dual comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 816 stands against Sony Xperia C5 Ultra Dual and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 816 is currently Rs. 19,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 21, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page